Source Mage code commit list

[flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>]

Eric Sandall (eric AT sandall.us) wrote [08.11.21 18:50]:
> >> The 2.8 fix is okay to apply to 2.7? I see in the bug that
> >> AC_ISC_POSIX is deprected, so I assume the new one will work, but
> >> wanted to verify it was tested. :)
> >>
> >
> > I don't have a machine runing glibc so it wasn't tested.  I usually
> > don't test against multiple versions of dependencies.
> 
> I believe one of the requirements for a commit is that it was tested  
> and works with the default version (and default settings) of a  
> package. ;)
> 
> -sandalle

That's true, but now I'm wondering which version you are implying is the
"default". glibc-2.7, or glibc-2.8? It seems that George had already
tested against 2.8, but he wasn't able to test against 2.7 until later,
and he was pointing out that he doesn't usually test against *multiple*
versions. Is 2.7 the default version, and he should have tested against
that instead?

-- 
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: pgpL60L6GZElE.pgp
Description: PGP signature