permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: "Frances and David" <fdnokes@hotmail.com>
- To: "permaculture" <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:26:43 -0700
Excellent reply, Tony!
I recall the discussion but wasn't sure how to find it.
Thanks for reiterating and embellishing these points.
The thing that struck me about this was that it is an obvious need of people to protect their communal water supply.
There would be a lot of concern if that was challenged! So, this was barking up the wrong tree as if just for the sake of barking.
Definitely a candidate for the nomer 'fear mongering'.
Can I quote you? With or without credit?
Thanks again.
Be well.
Frances
-----Original Message----- From: Toby Hemenway
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:59 AM
To: permaculture
Subject: Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water
On Oct 26, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Frances and David wrote:
http://worldtruth.tv/oregon-claims-state-ownership-over-all-rainwater/
it’s coming up again
and I’m wondering
is this really as scary as it is made to look?
Not to worry. Do some Googling about this if you want to get the facts. The guy was illegally and unwisely diverting and damming streams, not catching rain. A couple of paranoid "government is always evil" bloggers completely distorted what had happened. Most of what is in this article is untrue: for example, if you pave an area over a certain small size (varies by county), you must mitigate the runoff, get a permit, and deal properly with its impact on stream flow, contrary to what the article says. And the quoted state official does not say they own the rain or own the water, he says they regulate how water is handled by landowners--which means once it hits the ground and enters the surface and groundwater cycles. Big difference.
Oregon allows rainwater harvesting without a permit in most circumstances. Once rain lands on the ground it is considered a common, regulated resource--like forests on public land--and cannot be held in quantity without a permit (garden ponds excepted), though it can be drained or sunk with swales without a permit in many cases. Overland flow (not rain!) cannot diverted from downstream--and from other users, and fish, and wetlands--without having your system okayed, which makes sense to me. Too many badly designed ponds have done too much damage to watercourses and wildlife, hence they tightened the permit process a while back.
Toby
http://patternliteracy.com
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
message archives: https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture/
Google message archive search:
site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [searchstring]
Avant Geared http://www.avantgeared.com
-
[permaculture] this business of rain water,
Frances and David, 10/27/2012
-
Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water,
Toby Hemenway, 10/27/2012
-
Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water,
Frances and David, 10/27/2012
-
Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water,
Cory Brennan, 10/27/2012
-
Message not available
- Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water, Cory Brennan, 10/27/2012
-
Message not available
-
Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water,
Cory Brennan, 10/27/2012
-
Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water,
Frances and David, 10/27/2012
-
Re: [permaculture] this business of rain water,
Toby Hemenway, 10/27/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.