Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] permaculture Digest, Vol 51, Issue 20

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "J. Kolenovsky" <garden@hal-pc.org>
  • To: <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] permaculture Digest, Vol 51, Issue 20
  • Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:37:52 -0500

Buy now while you can! Spend life well while you can! - not sure if I
agree with the context here.

J

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:01:05 -0500
From: KNat <knat@sprintmail.com>
Subject: Re: [permaculture] GLOBAL WARMING:- A different 'take' on it
To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
Message-ID: <461CEA21.6020205@sprintmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I don't think we need to be re-hashing discredited and unproven theories

on this forum, in the face of this weight of scientific evidence, and
the seriousness of the crisis. I would suggest that our time is better
spent in figuring out how Permaculture contributes to the solution of
the problem as time is seriously running out.
Larry Saltzman

Time is not a commodity to run out. Much of this discussion frames it as

such and is the heart of the sensationalism of late. Permaculture defies
principles that are based on running out. The goal
of balance within and relationship.
The needs to be addressed are the same now as 7 generations ago and will

be the same for 7 generations hence. After that they will be the same
for another 7 generations but they will be able to perceive the needs so

differently from us now it won't feel the same.
Buy now while you can! Spend life well while you can! Same approach to
profit.

We will all/each live thru cycles in this Spiral Dance when we are pure
hearted and when we are not. We will affect others deliberately and
non-deliberately.

Money spent producing glitsy pamphlets on Global Warming will add to
Global Warming. Politicians getting elected and passing laws in a linear

fashion for financial gain will add to societal oppression, even if the
cause they propose is a "cleaner world."

A different viewpoint doesn't need to support the linear pretense so
debating between them here is, indeed, a bit silly. But reminding
ourselves there are other viewpoints is critical to our remaining
multi-faceted.

Peace,
Kathyann






-






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page