percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
- From: "Parlin, Steven" <PARLINS AT culver.org>
- To: "'Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion'" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:55:15 -0500
Jim
Piat,
Nice
try...but I won't let your case rest, not just yet. This is too
much fun.
This
linguistic mishap is not due to the lack of real world referents (Piat
and Forest), but to homonymous confusion with the first name, Jim.
There
is no ambiguity with Piat and Forest.
Steve
|
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?
, (continued)
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
Ken Armstrong, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
James Piat, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
Ken Armstrong, 10/14/2003
- Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, James Piat, 10/15/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
Ken Armstrong, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
James Piat, 10/09/2003
- RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, Robert_Pauley, 10/07/2003
- RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, Parlin, Steven, 10/07/2003
-
RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
Parlin, Steven, 10/08/2003
- Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, James Piat, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
JHForest, 10/08/2003
- Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, James Piat, 10/08/2003
- RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, Parlin, Steven, 10/08/2003
- RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, Parlin, Steven, 10/09/2003
- RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?, Parlin, Steven, 10/15/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future?,
Ken Armstrong, 10/09/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.