percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
RE: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions
- From: <Robert_Pauley AT oxy.com>
- To: <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 16:24:06 -0700
Title: Message
I
agree with Jim P and find the show insufferable. Bartlett's performance in the
press conference was a classic bit of rigged liberal dramaturgy, the wet-dream
dressing down worked up by the smart-ass editor of the Berkeley Univ. rag in his
shabby office after a long night successfully killing all opposing-view
submissions. Or Aaron Sorkin -- not that much different. The scene is also a
total distortion of reality, of how something like that might really play
out. I think Percy would have had a ball taking potshots at this new wave of
liberals, the Sorkins, Robbins, Penns, their putative humanism and yet near
contempt for a person who doesn't agree with
them.
Best,
RP
-----Original Message-----
From: percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Patrick P. Lynch
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:19 PM
To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion
Subject: Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions
From: percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Patrick P. Lynch
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:19 PM
To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion
Subject: Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions
In context of this particular show it needs to be recognized that she was the only reporter not standing in a group that were, by protocol to the office of the President, supposed to stand. She was doing so to make a political statement. His issue is not about her personally but about respect for the office itself, as I see it.PatrickHey Larry,Did you read Karey's clip from the West wing? The Bartlett character is my idea of a smug, self satisfied prick -- "in this bldg when the president stands nobody sits..." Gimme a break -- an abuse of power. Plain and simple. It's one thing to challenge authority from a position of weakness (however juvenile); but to weild power smugly is -- well, it's not something that pleases me. Nobody needs a smart ass rebuke about "respect" from the most powerful man in the world. Just the opposite is called for -- some show of humility and restraint. That's my take. But obviously others see the Bartlett character differently. That's what makes this discussion so much fun for me. Steve and Karey seem to both like this Bartlett character but disagree about about his theology -- I tend to agree more with Karey's theology than with Steve's (though both know a whole lot more about the Bible than I do) but I disagree with both of them about this Bartlett fellow.Jim Piat
--
An archive of all list discussion is available at http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermailVisit the Walker Percy Project at http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy --Patrick Lynch (padraig AT well.com and padrai6 AT comcast.net)
"Is it the water or the wave?" John Fowles, -The Magus-
-
Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions
, (continued)
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, Patrick P. Lynch, 08/15/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions,
RHONDA MCDONNELL, 08/18/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions,
James Piat, 08/18/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions,
RHONDA MCDONNELL, 08/18/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, Tim Cole, 08/19/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions,
RHONDA MCDONNELL, 08/18/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions,
James Piat, 08/18/2003
- RE: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, Parlin, Steven, 08/14/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, LTberrywtr, 08/15/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions,
LTberrywtr, 08/15/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, Mike Frentz, 08/15/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, marcus, 08/15/2003
- RE: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, Robert_Pauley, 08/15/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, LTberrywtr, 08/16/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, LTberrywtr, 08/19/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, marcus, 08/19/2003
- RE: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, Parlin, Steven, 08/19/2003
-
RE: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions,
marcus, 08/19/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, RHONDA MCDONNELL, 08/19/2003
- Re: [percy-l] The West Wing's comment on Biblical contradictions, Nikkibar, 08/25/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.