pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: pcplantdb
List archive
- From: Chad Knepp <pyg@galatea.org>
- To: pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [pcplantdb] starting then...
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:46:39 -0500
Lawrence F. London, Jr. writes:
> Chad Knepp wrote:
>
> > I have one question that I don't need to know the answer to right off,
> > but that we may want to discuss. This is, do we want to couple our
> > project tightly with Plone. I can, using Plone Archetypes, create
> > objects that are compatible with the plone CMS style of doing things,
> > subject to workflows, reviews, etc. The immediate/obvious advantage
> > is that things like comments, articles, and discussions already exist
> > in Plone and we don't have to create them later. I can also do this
> > pretty easily at a later date so I don't need to know right off.
>
> Does this mean that you would create, using the above-mentioned
> tools, the data entry interface for users to input material into
> the DB? Or do you plan to use other programming tools for this and
> if so would the end product offer the same or similar features as
> Plone (comments, articles, and discussions [and email notification
> of changes and new data entries])?
More or less answering you and John S. here... Yes, and yes. I don't
mean to imply limited to Plone, but including Plone. The fact that
Zope by default supports xml-rpc means that we can write all sorts of
tools to add/manipulate data that are not just web browsers. I will
probably write a python/GTK+ client for fun and personal use fairly
early on. I think what I'm asking is for buy in to the idea that by
exerting a small amount of additional effort I can make HG compatible
with Plone so that we can have comments, news items, discussions,
etc. without having to write those features separately.
> On another subject, a suggestion: Every record in every field in
> the DB should be appendable to an alphabetized Index hotlinked
> (hyperlinked or the Zope/Plone/whatever equivalent) to the search
> form wherein the item name is autimagically inserted in that form
> ready for the user to initiate the search.
I'm not understanding you here, explain more...
> I think a lot of users will want to see some sort of table of
> contents and index that mirrors the DB content, just the individual
> items, no description or other reference data. They may want to see
> graphically (text) the scope and content of the DB.
This is easy, and even with PFAF data sort of mind boggling as I've
occasionally selected every item in the db.
--
Chad Knepp
perl -e 'print pack"H*","7079674067616c617465612e6f72670a"'
-
[pcplantdb] starting then...,
Chad Knepp, 09/09/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] starting then...,
Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/10/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] starting then...,
Chad Knepp, 09/10/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] starting then..., Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/11/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] starting then...,
Chad Knepp, 09/10/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [pcplantdb] starting then...,
Stephanie Gerson, 09/10/2004
- [pcplantdb] Plone integration, John Schinnerer, 09/10/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] starting then...,
Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.