Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

oscri - Re: [Oscri] Desired CC Technology Summit outcomes

oscri AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Oscri mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Joe Benso" <joebenso AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Nathan Yergler" <nathan AT creativecommons.org>
  • Cc: oscri AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Oscri] Desired CC Technology Summit outcomes
  • Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:04:33 -0500

Hi all,

In response to Nathan's questions, the RC team would like to contribute...

* How do we identify content between registries? (ie, "are URIs enough?")

URI + optional physical copy at registry

: * What is the minimal feature set you need to make a truly useful registry?

technically: hash-code, timestamp, licensing-templates (CC, GPL,...)

organisation: trusted, long-term-operation, conformant to digital signature
laws in jurisdiction of country of operation, have database registered with
national data protection agencies

: * How are misuses/misclaims policed?

define revocation procedure in policy, registry must publish any withdrawn
works

: What questions are you hoping to have answered next week? What do you
: see as valuable outcomes?

Joint promotion of registries
Be aware, that there are already many registries out there (look at libraries,
music industry, film industry, ...)
Authority needs to co-operate with IFPI, patent offices, etc
Registration authority should not charge fee, in order to be attractive also
for micro-registries.

Best,

Joe Benso
Registered Commons





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page