nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
Re: [NAFEX] Patenting, Nov '06; was "cider apples.(re:tannic acid)"
- From: tanis grif <tanisgrif@yahoo.com>
- To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Patenting, Nov '06; was "cider apples.(re:tannic acid)"
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:14:38 -0800 (PST)
Important point, yes. But unfortunately, once a chance-seedling has gone
past some
certain points down the "public" route, it is no longer legal to patent it.
(Unless
the patent-applicant is willing to lie to the feds. I think that adds
another layer
of fuss-- & possible delay & expense-- to the patent process, and applicant
may end
up w/o a patent, at best.) My question is, how do we make & keep a nice
chance-seedling so public that no dishonest patent-applicant can patent it?
--- Dennis Norton <> wrote:
> Check out http://www.goodfruit.com/issues.php?article=335&issue=12 and you
> can find many chance seedlings that have been patented such as Ambrosia,
> Ginger Gold and Cameo to name a few. Ginger Gold is a chance seedling that
> sprang up in Clyde Harvey's orchard and he named it after his wife, Ginger!
> It is a deliciously sweet golden that is a summer apple (ripening in mid -
> late August in Northern Illinois.
>
> Dennis Norton
> Royal Oak Farm Orchard
> http://www.royaloakfarmorchard.com
> http://www.theorchardkeeper.blogspot.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tanis cuff" <>
> To: <nafex>
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.(re:tannic acid)
>
> >I just read the post from'Claude'-- thanks for that added info.!
> >
> > To clarify, Loneroc descrided a yellow apple of mine which he thought
> > will
> > make good cider because it has a great all-around flavor, then I
> > described
> > a second apple which is nowhere near as nice for just munching because it
> > has only sugars & tannins.
> >
> > In past months I've been reading about patenting chance-seedling apples.
> > For various reasons I don't think these can be patented, unless the
> > applicant would want to lie to the patent office more than a little. I
> > would like to make them as public & publicly available as possible,
> > ideally without the possibility of them being patented by someone more
> > willing to lie. I have a couple ideas. Anyone like to discuss?
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
-
[NAFEX] Cider apple
, (continued)
- [NAFEX] Cider apple, Claude Jolicoeur, 11/03/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.,
loneroc, 11/04/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] cider apples., Dennis Norton, 11/04/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.,
Del Stubbs, 11/04/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] cider apples., loneroc, 11/06/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.,
Peter Chrisbacher, 11/08/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.,
Dennis Norton, 11/09/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.(tannic acid),
tanis cuff, 11/09/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.(re:tannic acid), tanis cuff, 11/09/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.(re:tannic acid), Dennis Norton, 11/11/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] Patenting, Nov '06; was "cider apples.(re:tannic acid)", tanis grif, 11/11/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.(tannic acid),
tanis cuff, 11/09/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] cider apples.,
Dennis Norton, 11/09/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] cider apples., loneroc, 11/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.