nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
- From: "Thomas Olenio" <tolenio@sentex.net>
- To: "North American Fruit Explorers" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:28:09 -0400
hi,
Well, bulb plants are suited to the production of myco fungi, so that would not hurt either.
Tom
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:13:27 -0400, <list@ginda.us> wrote:
On Apr 12, 2006, at 7:41 AM, Thomas Olenio wrote:
Are you talking about a mulched flower bed beneath a tree?
Well, the area is already mulched, so there wouldn't be any added
benefit to the tree from that.
On Apr 12, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Matt Demmon wrote:
I have not actually done this, but from my observations and readings,
it seems like a good idea, actually. Bulbs are one of the things that
various permaculture people advise planting in an orchard, for the
precise reason that they do not compete with the trees, and assist in
keeping out things that do. Most bulbs are completely dormant by the
time the tree would be fruiting and under the highest heat and water
stress. It seems like in my area, you often see areas in peoples lawns
under trees where certain bulbs have naturalized around the trunk, and
the grass is unable to grow in that location. Also some bulbs would
provide nectar for early bees, feeding them before the fruit trees are
in bloom.
Thanks. Yes, they are completely dormant by the summer drought. The
possible competition would be in the spring, when the tree is putting
out its initial growth for the year. But you are right, they might
discourage weeds and grass from growing in the spring, and those
weeds compete with the tree much longer into the season.
I think this fall when I divide my daffodils a few will be going
under the tree.
Thanks,
Ginda
_______________________________________________
nafex mailing list
nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on web sites.
Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have permission!
**YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
No exceptions.
----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be used to change other email options):
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex
File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
Please do not send binary files.
Use plain text ONLY in emails!
NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/
--
============
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/306 - Release Date: 04/09/2006
-
[NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
list, 04/12/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
Thomas Olenio, 04/12/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
list, 04/12/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees, Thomas Olenio, 04/12/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
list, 04/12/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees, Matt Demmon, 04/12/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
Lon J. Rombough, 04/12/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees, Stephen Sadler, 04/12/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees, Jim Notkey, 04/12/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
Erdman, Jim, 04/13/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
Lon J. Rombough, 04/13/2006
- Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees, list, 04/13/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
Lon J. Rombough, 04/13/2006
-
Re: [NAFEX] daffodils and fruit trees,
Thomas Olenio, 04/12/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.