Market Farming

["GlobalCirclenet" <webmaster AT globalcircle.net>]

FDA tries to remove genetic label before it sticks
By Elizabeth Weise USA TODAY


PORTLAND, Ore. -- In an unusual  move, the federal government has warned
the 
state of Oregon that it could be  interfering with national food producers 
if voters pass a ballot measure  requiring all genetically modified foods 
sold in the state to be  labeled.

The unsolicited letter, which  arrived Monday in the office of Oregon Gov. 
John Kitzhaber, says the measure  "would impermissibly interfere with 
manufacturers' ability to market their  products on a nationwide basis."
The 
letter was signed by Food and Drug  Administration deputy commissioner 
Lester Crawford.

As much as 80% of the foods found in a typical American  supermarket
contain 
at least one ingredient created from genetically engineered  crops.
Backers 
of the measure don't claim the foods are dangerous, but they say 
consumers 
should be able to make informed choices. Critics say labeling is 
expensive 
and will force one label for Oregon foods, a different one elsewhere.

If voters pass the measure Nov. 5, Oregon will be the first  state to 
require labeling of so-called GE foods. Europe and Japan already  require 
labeling.

The FDA letter now inserts a federal interest in what to  this point had 
been a brewing state fight.

Still, Measure 27 is the subject of intense interest far  beyond Oregon's 
borders. Food suppliers and processors argue that if they lose  in Oregon, 
they'll face unjust suspicion from consumers that the foods aren't  safe
and 
the prospect of labeling laws in other states.

"In this letter, we are not promising to take action, but  we are letting 
the people of Oregon know, as best we can, what our views are  about the 
ordinance," a senior FDA official said.

The FDA statement appears to allude to the commerce clause  of the 
Constitution, which prohibits states from impeding the flow of interstate  
commerce, says Jonathan Adler, a professor of environmental and 
constitutional  law at Case Western Reserve law school in Cleveland.

The governor's press secretary, Tom Towslee, says the  governor was 
surprised to get the letter. "For the federal government to weigh  in on a 
ballot measure in little old Oregon is a little unusual, but they 
obviously 
feel strongly about it," Towslee says.

The two-page letter also states that the FDA has found  that, in its 
scientific judgment, there "is no significant difference" between  
bioengineered foods and their conventional counterparts.

Donna Harris, who launched the campaign to get the  initiative on the 
ballot, doesn't buy it. "If they're the same as everything  else, then how 
come they have a patent on them?"
______________________________________________________