livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?
- From: yarrow@sfo.com
- To: Healthy soil and sustainable growing <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:37:49 -0800
Title: Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?
Fat or Carbs: Which is Worse?
Dr. Andrew Weils article in the Huffington Post has led his readers to believe
that saturated fats in the diet, which are primarily from meats and
dairy products, are better for them to eat than carbohydrates, which
are from plant foods. He bases this on a March 2010 analysis that was
published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (that)
found that saturated fat was not associated with an increased risk
of coronary heart disease, stroke or coronary vascular disease. In
his opinion this piece of research is a significant exoneration of the
dietary saturated fat theory for the cause of heart disease. He failed
to mention that the National Dairy Council funded this study.
Furthermore, the formulation of Dr. Weils revolutionary
opinion on the wisdom of eating a diet high in animal foods appears to
have been uninfluenced by an accompanying editorial
written by the legendary authority on diet and heart disease, Jeremiah
Stamler, MD. Dr. Stamler debunked this dairy-industry funded study
based on its flawed methodology, and a disregard of 50 years of
diet-heart research with contrary findings, and dozens of metabolic
(ward-type-feeding) experiments showing that eating saturated fat
and/or cholesterol causes an adverse effect on blood lipids. In
addition, thousands of relevant animal studies on the damaging effects
of saturated fat and cholesterol were ignored.
In this Huffington Post article, Dr. Weil claims carbohydrates
are the real culprits, and he bases this in part on an April 2010
article from the Journal of the American Medical Association. This
population study found that increasing added dietary sugars from less
than 5% to more than 25% of the calories (a five-fold or more change)
caused a small increase in triglycerides (by 9 points, from 105 mg/dL
to 114 mg/dL), with a similar small reduction in good cholesterol
(HDL-C) (11 points, from 58.7 to 47.7 mg/dL). Most important to notice
is the large amounts of unhealthy carbohydrates (table sugar)
that must be consumed for even small changes in blood lipids to be
noticed.
In highly-controlled experiments, in order to show a rise in
triglycerides, the experimental design has to be based on feeding the
subjects large amounts of refined sugars and flours, and/or the
subjects in the experiments are required to eat more food than they
can comfortably consume; in other words, they are forced to overeat.
Confirmation of the healthfulness of carbohydrates is seen when people
are fed starches, such as whole grains, beans, and potatoes, and green
and yellow vegetables, rather than overfed sugars and flours; their
triglyceride levels do not increase.
Dr. Weils position runs contrary to several irrefutable
observations that you can make for yourself. Starches have fueled the
engines of human civilizations for at least the past 14,000 years.
Carbohydrates (starches), such as rice in Asia, corn in Central
America, potatoes in South America, and barley and wheat in Europe,
have provided the bulk of the calories for almost all human diets.
Only a few small primitive populations, living at the extremes of the
environment, such as the Inuit (Eskimos), have been fueled by
saturated fats. Just as undeniable, worldwide today, populations of
people who consume the greatest amounts of carbohydrate are the
trimmest and fittest, and also have the lowest incidence of heart
disease and diabetes. This truth is confirmed by observing the change
that occurs when people from Japan, for example, migrate to the United
States or Europe. As they eat less rice (carbohydrate) and more
saturated fat (meat and dairy products) they become fatter and
sicker.
Pointing the guilty finger away from fat and towards
carbohydrates is self-serving for those diet-experts who themselves
refuse to give up their high-fat diet. Food industries buy scientific
research published in respectable journals because it is one of their
most effective marketing tools. The end result of this mixing up of
the truth could be that billions of people will be deprived of a real
opportunity to live long, disease-free lives.
John McDougall, MD
www.drmcdougall.com
www.drmcdougall.com
Read this McDougall event announcement online at: http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2010other/news/weil.htm
© 2010 John McDougall All Rights Reserved
-
[Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
Tradingpost, 07/04/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
yarrow, 07/07/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
Tradingpost, 07/07/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
Harvey Ussery, 07/07/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
Tradingpost, 07/08/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?, Joan Vibert, 07/08/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?, Aliza Vanderlip, 07/08/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
Tradingpost, 07/08/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
Harvey Ussery, 07/07/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
Tradingpost, 07/07/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?, mdnagel, 07/05/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fat or Carbs: Which Is Worse?,
yarrow, 07/07/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.