Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] US plans massive data sweep

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Greg Brown <gwbrown1 AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] US plans massive data sweep
  • Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:58:13 -0500

"Plans" is probably not the most accurate word.  And by "US" you might want to substitute "current United States executive branch". 

On 2/12/06, Christian Stalberg <cstalberg AT internet-lab.com> wrote:
US plans massive data sweep
Little-known data-collection system could troll news, blogs, even
e-mails. Will it go too far?
By Mark Clayton | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
from the February 09, 2006 edition
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0209/p01s02-uspo.html

The US government is developing a massive computer system that can
collect huge amounts of data and, by linking far-flung information
from blogs and e-mail to government records and intelligence reports,
search for patterns of terrorist activity.

The system - parts of which are operational, parts of which are still
under development - is already credited with helping to foil some
plots. It is the federal government's latest attempt to use broad
data-collection and powerful analysis in the fight against terrorism.
But by delving deeply into the digital minutiae of American life, the
program is also raising concerns that the government is intruding too
deeply into citizens' privacy.

"We don't realize that, as we live our lives and make little choices,
like buying groceries, buying on Amazon, Googling, we're leaving
traces everywhere," says Lee Tien, a staff attorney with the
Electronic Frontier Foundation. "We have an attitude that no one will
connect all those dots. But these programs are about connecting those
dots - analyzing and aggregating them - in a way that we haven't
thought about. It's one of the underlying fundamental issues we have
yet to come to grips with."

The core of this effort is a little-known system called Analysis,
Dissemination, Visualization, Insight, and Semantic Enhancement
(ADVISE). Only a few public documents mention it. ADVISE is a research
and development program within the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), part of its three-year-old "Threat and Vulnerability, Testing
and Assessment" portfolio. The TVTA received nearly $50 million in
federal funding this year.

DHS officials are circumspect when talking about ADVISE. "I've heard
of it," says Peter Sand, director of privacy technology. "I don't know
the actual status right now. But if it's a system that's been
discussed, then it's something we're involved in at some level."

Data-mining is a key technology

A major part of ADVISE involves data-mining - or "dataveillance," as
some call it. It means sifting through data to look for patterns. If a
supermarket finds that customers who buy cider also tend to buy
fresh-baked bread, it might group the two together. To prevent fraud,
credit-card issuers use data-mining to look for patterns of suspicious
activity.

What sets ADVISE apart is its scope. It would collect a vast array of
corporate and public online information - from financial records to
CNN news stories - and cross-reference it against US intelligence and
law-enforcement records. The system would then store it as "entities"
- linked data about people, places, things, organizations, and events,
according to a report summarizing a 2004 DHS conference in Alexandria,
Va. The storage requirements alone are huge - enough to retain
information about 1 quadrillion entities, the report estimated. If
each entity were a penny, they would collectively form a cube a
half-mile high - roughly double the height of the Empire State
Building.

But ADVISE and related DHS technologies aim to do much more, according
to Joseph Kielman, manager of the TVTA portfolio. The key is not
merely to identify terrorists, or sift for key words, but to identify
critical patterns in data that illumine their motives and intentions,
he wrote in a presentation at a November conference in Richland, Wash.

For example: Is a burst of Internet traffic between a few people the
plotting of terrorists, or just bloggers arguing? ADVISE algorithms
would try to determine that before flagging the data pattern for a
human analyst's review.

At least a few pieces of ADVISE are already operational. Consider
Starlight, which along with other "visualization" software tools can
give human analysts a graphical view of data. Viewing data in this way
could reveal patterns not obvious in text or number form.
Understanding the relationships among people, organizations, places,
and things - using social-behavior analysis and other techniques - is
essential to going beyond mere data-mining to comprehensive "knowledge
discovery in databases," Dr. Kielman wrote in his November report. He
declined to be interviewed for this article.

One data program has foiled terrorists

Starlight has already helped foil some terror plots, says Jim Thomas,
one of its developers and director of the government's new National
Visualization Analytics Center in Richland, Wash. He can't elaborate
because the cases are classified, he adds. But "there's no question
that the technology we've invented here at the lab has been used to
protect our freedoms - and that's pretty cool."

As envisioned, ADVISE and its analytical tools would be used by other
agencies to look for terrorists. "All federal, state, local and
private-sector security entities will be able to share and collaborate
in real time with distributed data warehouses that will provide full
support for analysis and action" for the ADVISE system, says the 2004
workshop report.

A program in the shadows

Yet the scope of ADVISE - its stage of development, cost, and most
other details - is so obscure that critics say it poses a major
privacy challenge.

"We just don't know enough about this technology, how it works, or
what it is used for," says Marcia Hofmann of the Electronic Privacy
Information Center in Washington. "It matters to a lot of people that
these programs and software exist. We don't really know to what extent
the government is mining personal data."

Even congressmen with direct oversight of DHS, who favor data mining,
say they don't know enough about the program.

"I am not fully briefed on ADVISE," wrote Rep. Curt Weldon (R) of
Pennsylvania, vice chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee,
in an e-mail. "I'll get briefed this week."

Privacy concerns have torpedoed federal data-mining efforts in the
past. In 2002, news reports revealed that the Defense Department was
working on Total Information Awareness, a project aimed at collecting
and sifting vast amounts of personal and government data for clues to
terrorism. An uproar caused Congress to cancel the TIA program a year
later.

Echoes of a past controversial plan

ADVISE "looks very much like TIA," Mr. Tien of the Electronic Frontier
Foundation writes in an e-mail. "There's the same emphasis on broad
collection and pattern analysis."

But Mr. Sand, the DHS official, emphasizes that privacy protection
would be built-in. "Before a system leaves the department there's been
a privacy review.... That's our focus."

Some computer scientists support the concepts behind ADVISE.

"This sort of technology does protect against a real threat," says
Jeffrey Ullman, professor emeritus of computer science at Stanford
University. "If a computer suspects me of being a terrorist, but just
says maybe an analyst should look at it ... well, that's no big deal.
This is the type of thing we need to be willing to do, to give up a
certain amount of privacy."

Others are less sure.

"It isn't a bad idea, but you have to do it in a way that demonstrates
its utility - and with provable privacy protection," says Latanya
Sweeney, founder of the Data Privacy Laboratory at Carnegie Mellon
University. But since speaking on privacy at the 2004 DHS workshop,
she now doubts the department is building privacy into ADVISE. "At
this point, ADVISE has no funding for privacy technology."

She cites a recent request for proposal by the Office of Naval
Research on behalf of DHS. Although it doesn't mention ADVISE by name,
the proposal outlines data-technology research that meshes closely
with technology cited in ADVISE documents.

Neither the proposal - nor any other she has seen - provides any
funding for provable privacy technology, she adds.
Some in Congress push for more oversight of federal data-mining

Amid the furor over electronic eavesdropping by the National Security
Agency, Congress may be poised to expand its scrutiny of government
efforts to "mine" public data for hints of terrorist activity.

"One element of the NSA's domestic spying program that has gotten too
little attention is the government's reportedly widespread use of
data-mining technology to analyze the communications of ordinary
Americans," said Sen. Russell Feingold (D) of Wisconsin in a Jan. 23
statement.

Senator Feingold is among a handful of congressmen who have in the
past sponsored legislation - unsuccessfully - to require federal
agencies to report on data-mining programs and how they maintain
privacy.

Without oversight and accountability, critics say, even
well-intentioned counterterrorism programs could experience mission
creep, having their purview expanded to include non- terrorists - or
even political opponents or groups. "The development of this type of
data-mining technology has serious implications for the future of
personal privacy," says Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American
Scientists.

Even congressional supporters of the effort want more information
about data-mining efforts.

"There has to be more and better congressional oversight," says Rep.
Curt Weldon (R) of Pennsylvania and vice chairman of the House
committee overseeing the Department of Homeland Security. "But there
can't be oversight till Congress understands what data-mining is.
There needs to be a broad look at this because they [intelligence
agencies] are obviously seeing the value of this."

Data-mining - the systematic, often automated gleaning of insights
from databases - is seen "increasingly as a useful tool" to help
detect terrorist threats, the General Accountability Office reported
in 2004. Of the nearly 200 federal data-mining efforts the GAO
counted, at least 14 were acknowledged to focus on counterterrorism.

While privacy laws do place some restriction on government use of
private data - such as medical records - they don't prevent
intelligence agencies from buying information from commercial data
collectors. Congress has done little so far to regulate the practice
or even require basic notification from agencies, privacy experts say.

Indeed, even data that look anonymous aren't necessarily so. For
example: With name and Social Security number stripped from their
files, 87 percent of Americans can be identified simply by knowing
their date of birth, gender, and five-digit Zip code, according to
research by Latanya Sweeney, a data-privacy researcher at Carnegie
Mellon University.

In a separate 2004 report to Congress, the GAO cited eight issues that
need to be addressed to provide adequate privacy barriers amid federal
data-mining. Top among them was establishing oversight boards for such
programs.

---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!   http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page