Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Marcia <msmartin AT ccbeunet.br>]

Quoting Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>:

> And if they ask for help, I intend to travel to Connecticut to assist.

You, my brother-in-law, and my husband! 




> Marcia wrote:
> 
> 
> > I’m not sure why this is not getting more media attention, and why people
> seem 
> > to not really care. Maybe they don’t understand what this court decision 
> > really means?
> > 
> > Sorry... but I had to get this out of my system.
> 
> I agree.  I am so outraged I could chew nails right now.  I just didnt' 
> want to be the first one to post about it here on INW, since I've been
> responsible for enough political flame fests in the past.
> 
> That said, I thing this is a horrible decision by the Supreme Court. 
> And regardless of the so-called "Constitutionality" of this eminent 
> domain business, it's just plain **wrong**.  Personally I'm hoping that
> the homeowners up in New London decide to resist any attempt to seize
> their land, excercising their 2nd Amendment rights if necessary.  And if
> they ask for help, I intend to travel to Connecticut to assist.
> 
> An interesting post I saw on Slashdot earlier, by some Anonymous Coward,
> concerning this topic:
> 
> ----quote-------
> I think this kind of thing was the original intent of the 2nd Amendment
> - you know, the whole militia thing that presumably would be comprised
> of private citizens. I personally would not see any moral problem if
> these homes were protected by using lethal force against police
> evictions or rolling bulldozers. Hell, I would feel compelled to join
> them, despite never having fired a weapon and living in a
> new-development neighborhood that is unlikely to be affected by this
> ruling any time soon. Of course, such a militia would be stopped by
> overwhelming force, with all the limitations imposed on personal
> firearms. And though I have never posted here on the subject of
> privately-owned arms, I firmly believed in some limiitations such as
> those against assault and other military-grade weapons - until I read
> the article and realized the shear rediculousness and inherent
> unconstitutionality of this ruling.
> ------- end quote --------
> 
> So yeah, some people are finally starting to grok how this "Freedom" 
> thing really works.  You can't just sit around and expect the government 
> (or anybody else) to protect your Freedom. If you want it defended, you
> have to accept that you may have to do it yourself.
> 
> 
> TTYL,
> 
> 
> Phil
> -- 
> North Carolina - First In Freedom
> 
> Free America - Vote Libertarian
> www.lp.org
> 
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! 
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------
WebMail Litoral Internet
www.litoral.com.br