internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:49:04 -0500
I'm sure Christians as well as aetheists guilty of violence.
I've even heard of some Muslims guilty of violence in the name of religion.
;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Czeiszperger [mailto:michael AT czeiszperger.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:39 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2004, at 5:29 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
>
> > I have a close friend whose car is permanently damaged from
> egging just
> > before the election. Her Bush '04 sticker was ripped off. Stupid
> > people
> > exist on both sides of the isle.
>
> By all accounts there was election vandalism by both sides. But that
> is political, and I'm talking about religious violence. I
> believe that
> christians are guilty of all sorts of violence against any
> they believe
> are deserving of punishment, wether it be killing doctors or
> threatening atheist children with knives, all the way down to simple
> vandalism. The study on religious violence I read based on crime
> statistics showed relatively few incidents of violence or vandalism
> against christians compared to other religions. The vast majority of
> religious violence in the US is actually performed by christians
> against Jews and Muslims.
>
> http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/downey_24_4.htm
>
> _______________________________________
> michael at czeiszperger dot org
> Chapel Hill, NC USA
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Michael Czeiszperger, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Shea Tisdale, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Shea Tisdale, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Michael Czeiszperger, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Shea Tisdale, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Sil Greene, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, zman, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Tony Spencer, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Michael Czeiszperger, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Tony Spencer, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Michael Czeiszperger, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Tony Spencer, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Sil Greene, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Tony Spencer, 12/03/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Ian Meyer, 12/03/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Tony Spencer, 12/03/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Ian Meyer, 12/03/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Ian Meyer, 12/03/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Ian Meyer, 12/03/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Ian Meyer, 12/03/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.