internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: James Dasher <jdasher AT ibiblio.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:01:41 -0500
I wasn't going to comment. As what I've taken to calling a "re-switcher" (remember those "I'm a switcher" ads?), I've got those same "convert" biases that Ruth talked about. And who wants to hear a convert (or a re-convert) preach about the glories of the faith?
But the price-point discussion sucked me in. Like a new Catholic discussing the glories of the Eucharist and the awesome power of the Mass, I can assure all of my unconverted brothers and sisters that those lies the Wintel devils tell about the easy joys of sinful Windows usage - "all your friends are doing it, and 'Grand Theft Auto 47' is so good, you just *have* to try it!" - are just that: lies! And d@#$ lies!
<http://osviews.com/modules.php? op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=2350>
Seriously, though, even leaving aside TCO, I've priced my ideal Windows machine and compared it to my ideal Mac, and the difference is difficult to distinguish. Plus, the Mac runs on Unix, so you don't need to ssh (surely, you don't use telnet!) into your favorite Unix account just to configure a shell environment.
I even took my old iMac into work (PC-only) to set up a Web server so that my department could test a Web-based project management system. The sysadmin is part-time, and we have a service deal with Dell, but they still reboot the servers two or three times a week - in a good week. My iMac sat on a spare desk for four months - never turned it off, never rebooted it, and it just worked. No shares to set up, no samba configurations. (Since people were printing from their PCs, I didn't need to configure CUPS or anything, but you get my point.)
Final note: I was recently browsing for low-end servers that I could set up without having to tweak hardware configurations and so forth. Just something to do while I relaxed - y'all understand. :) And the best thing I could find was an eMac with a 160GB hard drive and 1GB of RAM. Those of you who prefer Windows servers probably won't appreciate it, but since it comes with all the Unix server stuff, I won't even have to shell out for (Microsoft) software.
Cheers - and thanks, Ian, for introducing the topic.
PS I'm on the back porch typing this from my iBook while some fink apps update in the background. Thanks again, Ian!
--
James Dasher
misterdasher dot com
IM misterdasher
-
RE: [internetworkers] why not a mac?
, (continued)
-
RE: [internetworkers] why not a mac?,
Tony Spencer, 11/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?, Ian Meyer, 11/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?, Alex Wilson, 11/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?,
Ian Meyer, 11/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?, matusiak, 11/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 11/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?, Ruth Suehle, 11/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] why not a mac?,
Shea Tisdale, 11/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?, Ruth Suehle, 11/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] why not a mac?,
zman, 11/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why not a mac?, James Dasher, 11/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] why not a mac?,
Tony Spencer, 11/11/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.