internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law)
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:02:43 -0500
> its income. if the so-called conservatives had been more active in
> seeing to setting aside some of the last 25 years' overpayments we
> wouldn't be in this mess.
>
> --rt
How can you set aside "overpayments" when your return on the investment is
approaching negative? Granted, I agree with you that both parties were
idiots when they dipped into the fund over the past few decades.
-
Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law)
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), Sil Greene, 11/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), James Dasher, 11/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), David Minton, 11/09/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), Tony Spencer, 11/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), David Minton, 11/09/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), Tony Spencer, 11/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), Ian Meyer, 11/09/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), Tony Spencer, 11/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), ron thigpen, 11/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), ron thigpen, 11/09/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), Tony Spencer, 11/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Erection (morality and law), ron thigpen, 11/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.