Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Shea Tisdale" <shea AT sheatisdale.com>
  • To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
  • Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:17:09 -0400

And if you want to know how other companies/organizations or unions donate to political campaigns, here is site with some great data.

You will note that the top 9 contributors are all solidly democratic

 

http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/topcontribs.asp?cycle=2002

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Shea Tisdale
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:12 PM
To: 'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'
Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?

 

Here is my problem.  It seems more often than not, a member of a particular party or those who lean in a particular direction wear blinders to the activities of that party.

 

And by that I specifically refer to almost any discussion of the economy or of corporate scandal that has taken place here where it is instantly blamed on the republican administration regardless of fact or reality.  These same individuals blamed Bush 41 for the economic downturn at the outset of the first Clinton administration, but now don’t want Clinton blamed for the economic downturn at the start of the Bush 43 administration.  The truth, as I tried to document it earlier, is that economic downturns take years to come into being and years to exit. 

 

And I'm not for Bush.  I want to see him go.  But blindly following any party or politician is how we get into these messes.

 

With that said, here are the stats on Enron's political campaign contributions where you can see that they were very slanted toward the Republican party from 1996 onward.

 


Enron Total Contributions to Federal Candidates and Parties, 1989-2001*

Back to Alert


Election Cycle

Total Contributions

Soft Money Contributions

Contributions from PACs

Contributions from Individuals

% to Dems

% to Repubs

1990

$163,250

N/A

$130,250

$33,000

42%

58%

1992

$281,009

$75,109

$130,550

$75,350

42%

58%

1994

$520,996

$136,292

$189,565

$195,139

42%

58%

1996

$1,141,016

$687,445

$171,671

$281,900

18%

81%

1998

$1,049,942

$691,950

$212,643

$145,349

21%

79%

2000

$2,441,398

$1,671,555

$280,043

$489,800

28%

72%

2002

$353,959

$304,909

$32,000

$17,050

6%

94%

TOTAL

$5,951,570

$3,567,260

$1,146,722

$1,237,588

26%

74%

NOTE: Soft money contributions were not publicly disclosed until the 1991-92 election cycle. 
*Based on FEC data downloaded 1/1/02.

 

 

 

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page