internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Frye, Matthew" <Matthew.Frye AT rexhealth.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] interactive spam block
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:51:18 -0400
>Even worse. What if someone forges e-mail from you and sends it to
>thousands or hundreds of thousands of earthlink subscribers! Now, all
>of a sudden, you're innundated with thousands and thousands of these
>challenges. Welcome to being joe-jobbed.
It gets worse yet. God help you if you're in the addressbook of someone who
gets a "virus." When the thing propagates and sends out email in your name,
you get all of the bounces from mail that you didn't initiate. I'm getting
10 or 12 MAILER-DAEMON errors per day right now, and rising. Worse yet, you
have no idea whose address book in the problem.
MPF
----- Confidentiality Notice -----
This e-mail and any attached documents contain confidential information
belonging to the sending entity, Rex Healthcare, and is intended only for the
use of the individual(s) or entity(s) associated with the recipient addresses
listed in the message header. The authorized recipient of this information
is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on the contents of the
email and/or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail
transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately to arrange for
return or destruction of this information.
To report abuse or inappropriate use, please email abuse AT rexhealth.com.
-
[internetworkers] interactive spam block,
Alan MacHett, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] interactive spam block,
Tanner Lovelace, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] interactive spam block,
Steven Champeon, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] interactive spam block,
Tanner Lovelace, 04/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] interactive spam block, Steven Champeon, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] interactive spam block,
Tanner Lovelace, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] interactive spam block,
Steven Champeon, 04/06/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [internetworkers] interactive spam block, Frye, Matthew, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] interactive spam block,
Tanner Lovelace, 04/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.