internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Frye, Matthew" <Matthew.Frye AT rexhealth.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:48:33 -0500
Man, this country needs real focus. People (including children) are
homeless, starving, addicted, and otherwise endangered, but our fine leaders
are more worried about making sure that two people who love each other don't
get "married."
Newsflash: who is really wrecking the idea of marriage...married people.
http://www.divorcemag.com/statistics/statsUS.shtml
Most interesingly...State with the lowest divorce rate: (1997)
Massachusetts. Rate per 1,000 population: 2.4
> ----------
> From: Phillip Rhodes[SMTP:mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk]
> Reply To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:16 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage
>
> Thomas Beckett wrote:
>
>
> >
> > In support of the Prayer Team's admirable goals, here is a proposed
> > Constitutional Amendment codifying marriage entirely on biblical
> > principles:
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > Here's a bible reference to check those passages if you want:
> > http://bible.gospelcom.net/
> >
>
>
> LOL! That's good stuff. We need a constitutional amendment
> defining marriage in Biblical terms about as bad as we need
> a new government beauracracy with a 10 gazillion dollar budget,
> 5 million employees, and a mandate to issue bogus "terror warnings"
> every so often, to get people used to the idea of living in the
> early stages of a police state.
>
> Better yet, if they really want to pass a constitutional amendment,
> how about make it something actually useful like a more
> clearly worded version of the 2nd Amendment, making it perfectly
> clear that it refers to Joe Citizen and not some hypothetical
> government controlled militia. Or a balanced budget amendment.
>
> TTYL,
>
> Phil
>
> --
> When the 1st Amendment no longer protects your voice.
> And when the 4th Amendment no longer protects your privacy or your stuff.
> Thank God we have the 2nd Amendment to tell our elected representatives
> that enough is enough.
> It's time to put "... from my cold, dead hands" back where it belongs.
>
> FREE AMERICA
> Vote Libertarian
> www.lp.org
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
-
[internetworkers] prayers to save marriage,
Thomas Beckett, 02/18/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/18/2004
-
[internetworkers] Sssssssmokin!,
Rowland Smith, 02/18/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Sssssssmokin!, Ruth Suehle, 02/19/2004
-
[internetworkers] Sssssssmokin!,
Rowland Smith, 02/18/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage,
Frye, Matthew, 02/19/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage, Lyman Green, 02/19/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage,
childers . paula, 02/19/2004
-
Message not available
- Re: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage, Lyman Green, 02/19/2004
-
Message not available
-
Re: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage,
Thomas Beckett, 02/20/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage, Maria Winslow, 02/20/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage, Michael Best, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] prayers to save marriage,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.