internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
[internetworkers] SpamBots: was [Fun with headers]
- From: "Alan MacHett" <machett AT ibiblio.org>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [internetworkers] SpamBots: was [Fun with headers]
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:58:05 -0500 (EST)
In response to Michael D. Thomas's message(s):
> - the postings to the list are (and have always been) archived for
> public reading.
> - As has been noted before, Google indexes the list.
>
Speaking of which...
Who knows the intricacies of spambots or regular expressions? As Michael
reminded us, the archives are open to the public, so they also are open to
spambots. Our email addresses are "disguised" as plain text, such as:
machett at ibiblio.org
and exist as "mailto:" links to the list (the easiest target for
spambots). Still, I'm wondering and guessing that someone has probably
written a spambot that searches for similar strings. Or am I being overly
paranoid?
just curious,
Alan
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers, Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Sil Greene, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Alan MacHett, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Alan MacHett, 01/29/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers, Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Alan MacHett, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Michael D. Thomas, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers, David R . Matusiak, 01/29/2004
-
[internetworkers] SpamBots: was [Fun with headers],
Alan MacHett, 01/29/2004
-
[internetworkers] Re: [Paranoia] : was SpamBots: was [Fun with headers],
David R . Matusiak, 01/29/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: [Paranoia] : was SpamBots: was [Fun with headers], Sil Greene, 01/30/2004
-
[internetworkers] Re: [Paranoia] : was SpamBots: was [Fun with headers],
David R . Matusiak, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Alan MacHett, 01/29/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers, Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers,
Ian Meyer, 01/29/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Fun with headers, Tom Boucher, 01/29/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.