internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Steven Champeon <schampeo AT hesketh.com>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:48:32 -0400
on Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:21:09PM -0400, David R. Matusiak wrote:
> now, if this "Top posting is blatantly wrong" idea is supported by some
> type of Internet Standards group, then just point me to the RFC and i
> would be glad to review the technical specifications and determine
> whether my electronic communications comply.
Do a google search, you silly.
RFC 1855: Netiquette Guidelines
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
Section 3.1.1,
General Guidelines for mailing lists and NetNews:
- If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
enough text of the original to give a context. This will make
sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
response to a message before seeing the original. Giving context
helps everyone. But do not include the entire original!
Granted, RFC 1855 is just an informational RFC, and like all other RFCs,
is not binding on anyone - except those who care about being a part of a
larger community run by convention and agreement upon best practices.
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
I dunno, I just guess that if you're going to spend the time to write
something to a list of a couple thousand people, you'd care that it be
sent in the manner most likely to result in their understanding it. And
top posting, to me, is a form of laziness, encouraged by poorly designed
mail clients, and as such should be discouraged at every turn. Like
HTML email, viruses, spam, and poor spelling ;)
There are those who disagree:
http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-bambenek-posting-guidelines-00.html
But they're wrong.
Steve,
electronic communications fundie
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: (919) 834-2552 f: (919) 834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
Book publishing is second only to furniture delivery in slowness. -b. schneier
-
[internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting,
David R. Matusiak, 05/28/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting, Bill Geschwind, 05/28/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting, Scott Russell, 05/28/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting,
ids, 05/28/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting,
Colleen McCarthy, 05/28/2003
- [internetworkers] Daquiri drive-thru follow-up, K. Jo Garner, 05/28/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting,
Colleen McCarthy, 05/28/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting,
Steven Champeon, 05/28/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting, Maria Winslow, 05/28/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting, Jay Cuthrell, 05/28/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting,
Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 05/28/2003
- [internetworkers] Excellent Terry Pratchett quotes, Diana Duncan, 05/28/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting,
Josep L. Guallar-Esteve, 05/28/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting, rthigpen, 05/28/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting, Diana Duncan, 05/28/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [internetworkers] thinly-veiled and insulting, Gina Norman, 05/28/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.