Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - [internetworkers] Re: relevant or not: meaningful work (in light of approaching Armageddon)

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "David R. Matusiak" <dave AT matusiak.org>
  • To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [internetworkers] Re: relevant or not: meaningful work (in light of approaching Armageddon)
  • Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:09:29 -0500

Paula -- i loved your post! probably the best i've read all year. :)

i have several lawyer friends, including TaB. most of them dislike one, several, or all of the aspects of practicing - long hours, high stress, lack of family time, etc, etc. complaints as unique as the person. so, one bit of advice before delving into the legal realm is to make certain that you want to spend 80 plus hours per week for the rest of your life (both in school and in practice). and some of that time could wind up frustrated by setbacks, failures, unforseens, etc.

note: the above description could easily be applied to a variety of fields, web developer, policy wonk, or anything profitable for that matter. people work hard in the pursuit of making "money." it has never amazed me to see people forfeit much of what they believe in simply for pursuit of a buck - or several bucks.

most people don't rack up $100K in student loans while at law school either, but in some cases that is realistic. speaking of which, if anyone knows of a firm or group of attorneys that need an Intellectual Property (IP) and Patent lawyer let me know, 'cause my friend Thomas in Portland, OR is tired of sitting on his couch faxing out resumes.

as you said, until more focus and energy is applied to "the work" itself we will continue to see such economic frustrations as massive layoffs, $2 Billion annual bonuses for CEOs, govt. cutting unemployment benefits, you name it.

now i'm not necessarily against putting pegs in holes, but i think we do need to encourage people to follow career pursuits that closely align with their intuitive abilities and interests. and we have to do so at a young age - in order to prevent many from wasting huge portions of their life (not)devoted to doing so many rote tasks.

self actualization is an interesting concept and worthy of examination; perhaps one that could help workers worldwide. how much of it is being accomplished i cannot comment on. but i think now that everything you do electronically is being tracked by the US govt. there will be a lot of "mandatory alignment" which could change a lot of peoples' perspectives.

- most manufacturing occurs in mexico, china, indonesia, taiwan, etc.
- a lot of tech work is being shipped off to india, pakistan, china, etc.
- many foreigners are being locked up for being foreign.

when there are no more people to manage, what happens to the managers?

soon we're back to the CEO/President sitting in the glass overseers booth and shouting instructions down to the workers via megaphone. and nowadays, those workers are prisoners at high-tech manufacturing 'prisons' where you get to whittle away your time making fscking trinkets that crowd up other peoples' lives.

interesting concept you have going Mister Bush. i'm interested to see how this story ends. here, have a postcard... ummmm... i mean calendar.

http://www.ibiblio.org/matusiak/2003cal.jpg

/drm

On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 04:57 PM, childers.paula AT epamail.epa.gov wrote:

Tom;

I just have to say, I've been considering for quite some time *becoming*
a lawyer simply so I *can* go do more meaningful work! However, the
type of lawyer work I would do would undoubtedly pay a lot less than I
make as a techie, but I still think I might feel better about myself at
the end of the day.

It all comes down to how you define meaningful. And frankly, what I
define as meaningful does not fit well with a profit-driven corporate
business model. Peace, justice, democracy, protecting the environment,
and civil rights are not aligned well with the profit motive. Note that
few of the people he mentions in the story as finding their "calling"
are still working in their ultra-corporate jobs. I just can't buy that
some people find deep meaning & fulfillment as Enron-style corporate
raiders... or as, say, the guy who sucks out porta-potties, either. The
guy who got into govt had months in bed to think - most of america's
lower classes don't have that kind of time, they have to work three jobs
to feed their kids.

Changing the face of work will take a shift in the consciousness of the
people doing the work, especially at the uper levels of society, to
drive the rest of it. Our society is not set up to provide enough
"meaningful" work at liveable wages even for those of us who go out
seeking such right now- nor are we (collectively) doing much to adjust
our ideas of success to embrace meaning over money. We are too busy
buying into the corporate patriot act. The article says "We are sitting
on a huge potential boom in productivity -- if we could just get the
square pegs out of the round holes." Well, no, that's just not it.
Meaning isn't found in MORE STUFF, whether you are buying it, selling
it, or making it. Productivity is not the right motivator. When will we
learn the answer is to stop trying to put pegs in holes in the first
place?

just my 2cents.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page