internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Rachel Cox <rachel AT hesketh.com>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Election day
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:06:29 -0500
At 01:33 PM 11/4/2002 -0500, Diana Duncan wrote:
[snip]
>Honestly, though, even if you're disappointed in the major races, there are
>many local races and issues that deserve a considered vote.
I'd posit that the major races do as well, even if you don't find any candidate as appealing as you'd like. *Someone* is going to be elected, and it's going to be one of the candidates on the ballot. Not voting doesn't actually send a message, IMO, because they don't give results for "and [X] percent of voters cast no vote for [insert race of choice]". Not voting in a given race is like trying to stop a train by standing on the tracks looking disappointed.
The Senate is currently divided almost exactly in half. If the Republicans regain control, Trent Lott will be the Senate Majority Leader and the GOP will chair every Senate committee, and if the House remains Republican then both houses of Congress and the White House will be Republican. If you find Republicans more congenial to your viewpoint, then by all means, feel free not to vote.
And then there are the courts to consider. It's expected that within the next six years, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor will retire; others may as well. New ones will be appointed, and Congress will approve or reject them. What they do matters, and if you think they can't take away freedoms we take for granted, think again. And of course it's not just the Supreme Court, either. If I understand it correctly, the party that controls the Senate Judiciary Committee controls the flow of appointments to the lower federal courts, and can serve as a check on the President, or as a rubber stamp. Me, I'd rather they serve as a check. But if you feel the current administration is doing a fine job protecting the civil liberties they think we should have, and are willing to give up the ones that they think are unimportant in the face of grave danger from terrorists, again, please feel free to not vote.
Otherwise, consider biting the bullet and voting for the lesser of the evils. In my opinion, that's a whole lot better than sitting back and waiting for the greater evil to take charge.
Cheers, y'all!
-Rachel
_____________________________________________________________________
Rachel Cox | Web Developer | 919.834.2552 x16 | hesketh.com/inc
Image is only the beginning. Knowledge is profitable.
http://www.hesketh.com/proof/white_papers/
-
[internetworkers] Election day,
Diana Duncan, 11/04/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Election day, Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 11/04/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Election day, Rachel Cox, 11/04/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
H. Wade Minter, 11/04/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Chuck Morford, 11/04/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
H. Wade Minter, 11/04/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Chris Hedemark, 11/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Rachel Cox, 11/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Chris Hedemark, 11/05/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Election day, Rachel Cox, 11/05/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Election day, Thomas Beckett, 11/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Chris Hedemark, 11/05/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Election day, H. Wade Minter, 11/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Rachel Cox, 11/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Chris Hedemark, 11/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
H. Wade Minter, 11/04/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Election day,
Chuck Morford, 11/04/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.