internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Welna.Sarah" <welna AT niehs.nih.gov>
- To: "'InterNetWorkers'" <internetworkers AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Vet Recommendations
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 14:06:21 -0400
hmm.. I guess I should consider myself lucky that I haven't had any
problems...
Although maybe I'll think twice about taking him there, if he has something
seriously wrong with him - he's done just fine with the yearly check-ups.
Sarah
-----Original Message-----
From: Childers.Paula AT epamail.epa.gov
[mailto:Childers.Paula AT epamail.epa.gov]
Subject: [internetworkers] Re: Vet Recommendations
I know people who think Park is great, and others who have had negative
experiences there. I would not want to take my pets there, but I'm
basing that mostly off one thing- they seem to always be running help
wanted ads for new assistants. What is it about the place that runs
people off? Are they just unlucky, or do they pay poorly, or is the vet
a pain to work for, or what? Most of the possible answers are negative,
in my mind. YMMV.
Paula the lurker
-
Vet Recommendations,
Dallas Smith, 05/13/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Vet Recommendations, Welna.Sarah, 05/13/2002
- Re: Vet Recommendations, Jeri C. Gloege, 05/13/2002
- Re: Vet Recommendations, anilorac Dan, 05/13/2002
- Re: Vet Recommendations, Childers . Paula, 05/13/2002
- Re: Vet Recommendations, Welna.Sarah, 05/13/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.