Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: another boost for Durham

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Steven Champeon <schampeo AT hesketh.com>
  • To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: another boost for Durham
  • Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:54:09 -0400



Wow - proof that we're truly living in the post-ironic age.

S

on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:52:54AM -0700, saundrakaerubel.com wrote:
> you missed the smiley face as my message was only intended to be
> funny. Obviousely, my intention did not quite come across, and next
> time I will be much more specific and carry a disclaimer.
>
> Diclaimer: the message below is intended to be conveyed with humor
> and any other meaning is not to be construed from the sender's PoV.
>
> At 12:43 PM 10/11/2000 -0400, you wrote:
> >On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, saundrakaerubel.com typed:
> >Are your (sic) discriminating against cybersquatters? Does
> >InternetWorkers have a NO CYBERSQUATTERS policy?
> >
> >< There is no such policy. From my understanding of Tom's line:
> >> We need to get him out to InterNetWorkers for damn sure!
> >< he is intimating that $human should be included in InterNetWorkers. If
> >anything, he is discriminating in favor of cybersquatters. "Out to" not
> >"out of" INW: it is a subtle distinction.

--
tired of being an underappreciated functionary in a soulless machine?
hesketh.com is hiring: http://www.hesketh.com/careers/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page