Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: another boost for Durham

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Thomas A. Beckett" <thomas AT tbeckett.com>
  • To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: another boost for Durham
  • Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:51:49 -0400


We do, however, discriminate against recruiters. No headhunters! :-)

That being said, we've had a headhunter or two show up from time to
time. All our "rules" are loosely enforced. But for some reason the
headhunters don't come back.

TaB

"tengu typed, not" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, saundrakaerubel.com typed:
> Are your (sic) discriminating against cybersquatters? Does
> InternetWorkers have a NO CYBERSQUATTERS policy?
>
> < There is no such policy. From my understanding of Tom's line:
> > We need to get him out to InterNetWorkers for damn sure!
> < he is intimating that $human should be included in InterNetWorkers. If
> anything, he is discriminating in favor of cybersquatters. "Out to" not
> "out of" INW: it is a subtle distinction.
> ---
> "You understand we are tied down to a language which makes up in obscurity
> what it lacks in style." -Player King, RAGAD
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to internetworkers as: thomas AT tbeckett.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page