Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] Challenge---long

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Leslie <cayadopi AT yahoo.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] Challenge---long
  • Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 17:06:12 -0700 (PDT)

When I lived in S FL, my own personal doc and her partners didn't take
insurance.  They worked full time, and her office was always packed.  We all
got great care, and if your needs required it, you got a lot of face time
with the doc - not to mention they actually phoned you at home with results
instead of making another appt (just to bill ins co).
 
On the other hand, I had a great debate with another doc,a surgeon, who
believed that without insurance he couldn't survive.  Shortly after the
debate he lost his license to practice...malprractice suit/guilty.  His job
after?  Reviewing other docs work in other malpractice cases (for
plaintiffs...) ... ironic.
 
 
 
On 4/1/2010 2:47 PM, Leslie wrote:
> Agree, health care bill is going to worsen things in rural areas, etc.
>   

It's odd how things work out.

I'm not sure of all the reasons, and I suspect there would be many if
someone were to make a study of it, but I wouldn't expect to see much
change here in the way physicians' practices go.

One reason is that the upper New England area is not where one goes to
be rich; that's pretty much a given no matter what sort of work one
does, so while we have some doctors here who are "in it for the money",
they are not in the majority.  Another reason is that in New England in
general and VT, NH, and ME especially, people don't much care to be told
what to do: independence trumps orders every time, or maybe that's
stubborn bullheadedness, but either way, people tend to just put their
heads down and walk into the storm.

Ever since I've been here (bit over 20 years now) there have been a
number of doctors, PAs, NPs, etc that do not take insurance of any
kind.  For the past 15 years or so the numbers have increased to be
about 3-4 times now the number there were when I came here.  From
talking to people who've been here longer than I, that seems to have
started when insurance companies began demanding that there be time
limits on appointment times.  Then came refusal to pay for certain drugs
for arbitrary reasons, followed rapidly by demands for limited
referrals, billing-structure regulations, control of specialists' intake
of patients, etc.  None of those things went over well and over the
years there came to be more and more folks operating independent
practices.  Their fees are much lower, care much better, and the
frustration and expense of dealing with insurance companies means that
everyone stays in a better mood all the time.  I deliberately work for
an independent practice and the difference from an employee point of
view is profound.  There has been increased pressure from various
insurance companies over the years to "bring them in line" but to no
avail.  Then they (ins) began to try and pressure for legislation to
make changes but that laid an egg, too.  Finally they seem to have given
up in the last few years but I notice they never miss a chance to take a
dig at the quality of care here....falls on deaf ears here.

I'm not sure what the income averages here, but I know of the several
medical caregivers immediate to my area that they are well above the
$100, 000 mark.  Disregarding income increases, quite a number of
doctors here work only 2/3/4 days a week: enough for an income that they
perceive meets their needs, and that's that.  One is a full-time farmer,
another teaches and does some traveling for an ecology-education group,
various others do whatever it is they do, but the common factor is that
they are at work when they want to be, home with their families much of
the time, whatever.  Overall, it seems to have been an equitable
agreement and helps keep the community strong; there is much less of the
'them vs us' kind of grumbling around here than there was where I came
from.  I think it's the case because professional people mix right in
with everybody else for a school activities, or contradancing,
clean-the-beach day, potato gleaning, whatever's going on, they and
their families tend to be part of it all, rather than what would be seen
as "too busy" or worse yet (around here), "too good".  They drive Subaru
or Toyota like anyone else.

We still have quite a number of doctors here who initially came to Maine
as a part of a program that promised to pay school fees (don't know
whether part of all) in return for X years at a rural health post.  A
lot came here to ditch their school loans, then stayed for money to
start a practice, and are still here many years later.

It seems to me that this model could/would work in many places but when
I mentioned it to a midwestern friend (physician) I thought he would
have a stroke; he strongly believes he has to have the insurance money
or go belly-up.  Can't be the case because there are any number of
doctors there who treat the German Baptist and Amish groups in the area,
and none of them are taking insurance, for sure, since neither group
believes in insurance.  I often hear the excuse that "those doctors are
from their own churches, that's why they can get away with it" but I
know of 5 doctors in the county where I grew up who don't take
insurance, and only one of them grew up German Baptist and stayed in the
church.  He went to school on German Baptist money because when he was
in high school that church decided to send a student to medical school
in return for the agreement that said student would return to the
community and practice.  Seems to have worked; when I was there in 2007
he was looking forward to retiring, which he is scheduled to do as soon
as the next student they sent is finished school.    They just lost a
doctor age 52, sudden cardiac failure of some sort, who was also in the
church but did not have church-funded schooling, not sure who will take
that practice.

As to the Amish, they simply don't stand behind that much schooling but
are willing to pay for someone with unlike beliefs who did go to school,
hardly a 'one of them' situation....  These guys all make house calls,
have hitching rails (and sheds),  and cope on a daily basis with the
fact that telephones and electricity are not part of their patients'
lives, along with all sorts of other issues peculiar to working with
plain people.  They all take patients who are not German Baptist or
Amish, but none of them take insurance of any kind.  Three that I know
of will trade for farm goods, horses, construction labor, other things,
don't know about the others.

So there are obviously two ways to deal with medical coverage (human,
not insurance coverage) that for the most part seem to be intensely
regional and mostly rural, but there are other ways, too.  Why more
people don't look around and start asking questions and initiating
changes I don't understand, but I get the feeling that too many people
in this society are waiting for someone else to make the decisions, and
then they scramble to adjust to the status quo and grumble interminably
about how it's not working for them.

I read an article in the weekend paper about how doctors somewhere are
up in arms about the anticipated new insurance payments/non-payments,
and knowing how many practices rely almost totally on insurance
payments, I understand their angst.  But maybe they will be the very
ones to make the sorts of changes that make their own lives, and that of
those in their respective communities, both more productive and more
satisfying.  Or maybe not, maybe they'll just go on acting like the
victims they've allowed themselves to become.

SJ, who enjoyed the beautiful spring day by clipping19 goats
(neighbors') and one dog (mine) today.  Hooves and nails tomorrow.....
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/cayadopi%40yahoo.com
View the archives at:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/homestead




________________________________

From: sjc <indexer AT fairpoint.net>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Thu, April 1, 2010 6:38:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Challenge---long




>From erthnsky AT gmail.com Thu Apr 1 20:38:20 2010
Return-Path: <erthnsky AT gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id 5CD4E4C015; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:38:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
version=3.2.3
Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com (mail-gw0-f49.google.com
[74.125.83.49])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888934C014
for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:38:19 -0400
(EDT)
Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so1215729gwj.36
for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:38:19 -0700
(PDT)
Received: by 10.101.189.24 with SMTP id r24mr3935234anp.12.1270168698205;
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([97.72.63.52])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1270939iwn.3.2010.04.01.17.38.12
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BB53C64.2060001 AT gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:37:56 -0400
From: EarthNSky <erthnsky AT gmail.com>
Organization: EarthNSky Farm
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
References: <2115a.401e216f.38e3a602 AT aol.com>
<651315.19938.qm AT web63801.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
<2734FC22099D47109E369A54EB468A85@yourxb2x7j77gn>
<120803.93108.qm AT web63801.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
<4BB52050.6010601 AT fairpoint.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BB52050.6010601 AT fairpoint.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Challenge---long
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:38:20 -0000



sjc wrote:
>
>
> We still have quite a number of doctors here who initially came to
> Maine as a part of a program that promised to pay school fees (don't
> know whether part of all) in return for X years at a rural health
> post. A lot came here to ditch their school loans, then stayed for
> money to start a practice, and are still here many years later.
>
> It seems to me that this model could/would work in many places but
> when I mentioned it to a midwestern friend (physician) I thought he
> would have a stroke; he strongly believes he has to have the
> insurance money or go belly-up. Can't be the case because there are
> any number of doctors there who treat the German Baptist and Amish
> groups in the area, and none of them are taking insurance, for sure,
> since neither group believes in insurance.
Way back in the early 80's, I entered med school on one of those
'deals'. Things may be different now, but back then, only poor kids
with a dream, like me, students who wanted to become a doctor but could
not qualify for specialty scholarships or weren't from a family of
physicians for four generations back, only those of us who fit no place
else, were willing to sign away potential profits for years to pay for
school. Even back then, the goal was to line one's pockets, not to
provide a service. Those of us who intended to go into research or play
non-traditional roles were usually the ones who signed up for rural
servitude. I still think it is a great idea. In fact, I think that all
physicians should have a year of rural practice added to their residency.



> As to the Amish, they simply don't stand behind that much schooling
> but are willing to pay for someone with unlike beliefs who did go to
> school, hardly a 'one of them' situation.... These guys all make
> house calls, have hitching rails (and sheds), and cope on a daily
> basis with the fact that telephones and electricity are not part of
> their patients' lives, along with all sorts of other issues peculiar
> to working with plain people. They all take patients who are not
> German Baptist or Amish, but none of them take insurance of any kind.
> Three that I know of will trade for farm goods, horses, construction
> labor, other things, don't know about the others.

The first time I went up north into 'Amish land' (it was actually a
little Mennonite town in southern Iowa) I saw what impressed the heck
out of me....
There in this quaint little town, where the streets were lined with
parking meters and stores you might have seen prior to WWII, was a
3-story veterinary hospital...the tallest building in town!! That told
me that what you say is true, that while the Amish and other close knit
societies support their own where they can, they also support those who
are more educated than average. No insurance for farm animals, but
apparently vets do quite well in a community that depends on animals for
transportation and food. I later noticed the same phenomena in towns
in Illinois.
I guess I'm just saying that I agree that good healthcare, for animals
or people, doesn't require insurance, if the provider is in a network
where no insurance is the norm. That's funny coming from me, the one
who relies on expensive arthritis meds to stay moving. I can't even
reconcile that dichotomy within myself.


> Why more people don't look around and start asking questions and
> initiating changes I don't understand, but I get the feeling that too
> many people in this society are waiting for someone else to make the
> decisions, and then they scramble to adjust to the status quo and
> grumble interminably about how it's not working for them.

You're right, and that attitude is only getting worse. So many of us
wait around on other people to make the decisions in our lives. No one
is proactive anymore. It is all about grumbling over the status quo...a
competition of sorts as to who has it worse.

>
> I read an article in the weekend paper about how doctors somewhere
> are up in arms about the anticipated new insurance
> payments/non-payments, and knowing how many practices rely almost
> totally on insurance payments, I understand their angst. But maybe
> they will be the very ones to make the sorts of changes that make
> their own lives, and that of those in their respective communities,
> both more productive and more satisfying. Or maybe not, maybe
> they'll just go on acting like the victims they've allowed themselves
> to become.

I don't see them as victims in the same way I don't see those
non-bonused CEO's as victims. They have lined their pockets and worked
the system for years...took their vacations to Europe, bought their kids
Porsches and college degrees, ate at the finest restaurants and played
on the best golf courses, etc. I know how greed has shaped their
lives. What is about to happen is kharma. What goes around, comes
around. They will either accept it, or quit and whine about it.


>
> SJ, who enjoyed the beautiful spring day by clipping19 goats
> (neighbors') and one dog (mine) today. Hooves and nails
> tomorrow.....

I am so glad to hear that you are up and about again. I would ask how
the knees are, but I see you are better than ever...

Bev


--
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are
willing to work and give to those who would not. Thomas Jefferson





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page