Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] Fannie/Freddie bailout question

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] Fannie/Freddie bailout question
  • Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 13:57:19 -0500


On Sep 13, 2008, at 8:34 PM, Clansgian AT wmconnect.com wrote:


As the inventory of REOs builds, banks will become amenable to holding
payments at their original rate.

Yes, except for two things, one addressed below and the other one is that in
many cases the original paymens not only did not pay any on the principal but
didn't cover the interest on the loan. For the banks to continue with that
loan at the original rate, they'd have to be bleeding money which they can't do.

The decision depends on the loss from continuing the loan versus the hit they take if they have to sell a home after foreclosure, which often means a home that has been abandoned, vandalized, the landscaping dead. When that happens the mortgage holder may well have to sell for tens of thousands less than the note. In many cases they are better off working out a plan where the mortgagor can stay in the home and continue the same or even lower payments. The motivation for the mortgagor is they get to stay in the house they chose, the kids stay in the same school, and they don't have to go looking for a rental, which is almost always a less desirable dwelling.


A dangerous condition exists if mortgagors react negatively to the
news that they are making payments on a loan that is greater than
their home is worth.

Dangerous for whom? If a person finds themselves paying for an asset that is
worth far less than they are paying, it only makes sense to nullify that
agreement as quickly as possible and quit doing that.

Misunderstanding. The danger is to everyone, but mostly the US economy.

The only cudgle to hold
over their heads is that their "credit" might be ruined. For many of these
people before the bubble they would not have qualified for the loan and here after
the bubble they don't qualify for any such loan so it is an idle threat to
give them a bad credit score.

That is incorrect. Bad credit will affect a rental application. It will affect a car loan application. It will affect a utilities hookup request. Bad credit has many tentacles, many more than just the next home mortgage.

This is an example of the power of the
sensationalist and negative media.

Just the opposite I'd say. The fact that so many people bought into the
housing frenzy was the result of sensationalism and media hype. What follows is
just the natural consequence of falling for that hype.

But don't you see, they fell for the buzz going in and now they may well fall for the buzz going out. Instead of making prudent decisions, too many are knee jerking to what the media is selling as fact and forecast.

And, frankly, a whole lot of the motivation going in was simple greed.

I am still waiting for your definition of socialism in the context you used it.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page