Homestead mailing list

[Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>]

Darth Vader's Family Values

By JOHN TIERNEY
Published: May 21, 2005

Wherever you are, Adam Smith, call your agent. Darth Vader is stealing your 
best stuff.

The new installment of "Star Wars" has set off the usual dreary red-blue 
squabble, with liberals using the film to attack Republicans, and some 
conservatives calling for a boycott. But - and I know this is hard to 
believe for a movie with characters named General Grievous and Count Dooku 
- there's actually a serious bipartisan lesson about the dark side of politics.

If you can sit through the endless light-saber duels and robotic dialogue, 
you finally see what turned Anakin Skywalker into Darth Vader. He set out 
to become a Jedi knight who will use the Force for good, but he's 
traumatized, first by the murder of his mother, then by a vision that his 
wife will die in childbirth.

His fears are manipulated by Chancellor Palpatine, the leader of the Senate 
(who's being compared to Senator Bill Frist in Moveon.org commercials). 
When this oily politician extols the power of the dark side of the Force, 
Anakin at first protests that those who use it think "only of themselves," 
whereas the Jedi are "selfless" and "only care about others."

He says he could never betray the Jedi because they're his family, but then 
the chancellor puts the family question in perspective: "Learn to know the 
dark side of the Force, Anakin, and you will be able to save your wife from 
certain death." Anakin promptly recognizes the limits of altruism, just as 
Adam Smith did in the 18th century.

Smith knew that some people professed love for all humanity, but he 
realized that a man's love for "the members of his own family" is "more 
precise and determinate, than it can be with the greater part of other 
people." Hence his famous warning not to rely on the kindness of strangers 
outside your family: if you want bread, it's better to count on the baker's 
self-interest rather than his generosity.

This has never been a popular bit of advice because selfishness is not 
admired in human societies any more than among Jedi knights. We know it 
exists, but it feels wrong. We are born with an instinct for altruism 
because we evolved in clans of hunter-gatherers who would not have survived 
if they hadn't helped one another through hard times.

The result is an enduring political paradox: we no longer live in clans 
small enough for altruism to be practical, but we still respond to 
politicians who promise to make us all part of one big selfless community. 
We want everyone to be bound together with a shared set of values, a 
yearning that Daniel Klein, an economist, dubs the People's Romance in the 
summer issue of The Independent Review.

The People's Romance is his explanation for why so many Americans have come 
to love bigger government over the past century. Their specific objectives 
in Washington differed - liberals stressed charity and social programs for 
all, while conservatives promoted patriotism and spending on national 
security - but they both expanded the government in their quest for a 
national sense of shared purpose.

The result, though, has not been one happy community because America is not 
a clan with shared values. It is a huge group of strangers with leaders who 
are hardly altruists - they have their own families and needs. Tocqueville 
recognized the inherent problem with the People's Romance when he described 
citizens' contradictory impulses to be free while also wanting a government 
that is "unitary, protective and all-powerful."

People try to resolve this contradiction, Tocqueville wrote, by telling 
themselves that democracy makes them masters of politicians, but they soon 
find that the Force is not with them, especially if they're in the 
minority. Republicans used to rail helplessly at Democrats for taxing them 
for destructive social programs and curtailing their economic liberties; 
now Democrats complain about the money squandered on the Iraq war and the 
threat to civil liberties from the Patriot Act.

For those Democrats, the signature line in this "Star Wars" is the one 
spoken after the chancellor, citing security threats, consolidates his 
power by declaring that the republic must become an empire. Senator Padmé 
listens to her colleagues cheer and says, "So this is how liberty dies, 
with thunderous applause."

She's disgusted with them, but their enthusiasm is understandable. The 
chancellor has tapped into their primal desire to unite in one great clan 
with a shared purpose. They're in the throes of the People's Romance.

For further reading:

“The People’s Romance: Why People Love Government (As Much As They Do)” by 
Daniel Klein, Santa Clara University (working paper).

The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation by 
Matt Ridley (Penguin Books, 295 pp., 1998).

The Theory of Moral Sentiments by Adam Smith.

The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/21/opinion/21tierney.html?