Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - [Homestead] Corporations---Nost Malevolent Cancers of our time

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Tvoivozhd <tvoivozd AT infionline.net>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Homestead] Corporations---Nost Malevolent Cancers of our time
  • Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:51:46 -0800

Keith Addison and tvoivozhd exchange.


biofuel



e:

<http://archive.nnytech.net/sgroup/biofuel/>
<http://www.nnytech.net/>

*30617 <http://archive.nnytech.net/sgroup/biofuel/30617/1/>2003-12-24 [biofuel] Mammoth corporations
*

| |
Date: 2003-12-24
From: Keith Addison
Subject: [biofuel] Mammoth corporations

"Small-scale capitalism works out fine, but as scale increases the departure from real capitalism becomes more pronounced---profits are privatized, but costs are socialized. The attendant repair and maintenance are left to succeeding generations if possible, if not, to present low and middle income taxpayers." - "tvoivozhd"

"When democracy goes down before monopoly capitalism the result has been a greedy tyranny, preserving all the vices of capitalism and extinguishing its virtues."
- Herbert Agar

"If I could wave my hand as the benevolent despot and make a sweeping change in the U.S. legal system, I would undo the hundred years of court decisions that have given corporations all the rights of citizens and relegated all the rest of us living, breathing human beings to second-class citizenship." - John Stauber

From Roberto Verzola, secretary-general of the Philippine Greens, on another list:

>Economics, properly defined, is the study of human behaviour in the
>marketplace. IT is a BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE. Unfortunately, people are too
>often greedy and the economic models can predict behaviour by reducing
>humans to a collection of pecuniary interests.
>
>So, the problem is not to change economics. The problem is to change
>people's attitude. When that happens, the economist's models will fail.
>
>You can denounce economics all you want, but it is really human behaviour
>that is the problem. That is what we need to address.
>
>Pat

Hi Pat.
I have a different interpretation: it is true that people are
occasionally / often greedy in varying degrees. However economists
idealized this greed and made it the centerpoint of the ideal economic
agent. Then society created a legal person in the perfect image of
this idealized economic agent. This legal person is the
corporation/business firm, the epitome of pure greed. Corporations
(which I'd count as if they were a separate species) have domesticated
many humans and forced them to act and think like corporations too.
This is what we need to address.
Roberto Verzola

Prehistoric peoples could kill mammoths; how about corporations?
by Roberto Verzola

Most legal systems today recognize the registered business firm as a distinct legal person, separate from its stockholders, board of directors or employees. In fact, laws would often refer to "natural or legal persons". It should therefore be safe to conclude that such registered business firms or corporations are persons (ie, organisms), but NOT "natural persons", and therefore not humans.

Other social institutions have been created by humans (State, Church, etc.), but they have never quite reached the state of life and reproductive capacity that corporations attained.

It would be very useful to analyze corporations *as if* they were a different species, and then to extract ecological insights from the analysis. (By corporations here, I am basically referring to registered business firms, or for-profit corporations).

Corporations are born; they grow; they might also die. They can reproduce and multiply, using different methods, both asexual and sexual. We have bacteria within our bodies as if they were part of us; corporations have humans within them. Their genetic programming - profit maximization - is much simpler than human genetic programming, humans being a bundle of mixed and often conflicting emotions and motives. Corporations' computational capabilities for such maximization easily exceed most natural persons' capabilities. Therefore they easily survive better in the economic competition.

It is profit that keeps corporations alive. They are genetically programmed to maximize the flow of profits into their gut. To extract profit from their environment, corporations transform everything into commodities and then make profits by selling them or renting them out. Corporations can transform practically anything into a commodity, including corporations and profits themselves.

Today, corporations are the dominant species on the planet. They have taken over most social institutions and other niches that humans have originally created for themselves. The physical reach of the biggest corporations span the entire globe. The term "globalization" can mean, without exaggeration, the global rule of corporations.

The non-stop transformation of the natural world - the ecological base of human survival - into commodities for profit-making has, in fact, become a threat to the survival not only of human beings but of many other species.

In the same way that we learned to domesticate plants and animals, corporations have learned to domesticate humans. Much of today's educational process is a process of corporate domestication, reinforced subsequently by corporate-controlled media. Corporations have perfected the art of training humans, using carrot-and-stick methods, to keep them tame and obedient.

Of course, some humans have remained wild and undomesticated. But today, they are outside the mainstream.

Corporations have trained domesticated humans to immobilize, maim, kill or otherwise "neutralize" those fellow-humans who have remained feral and uncontrolled by corporations. But there's a growing body of feral humans who are now trying to learn how to disable, maim or kill corporations.

Prehistoric humans knew how to kill the largest beasts of their time; modern humans have not yet learned how to kill corporations. Individual humans have practically no hope of fighting off a determined corporate attack. Most confrontations between corporations and communities of humans end up in corporate victory, with humans ending up dead, maimed or subdued and domesticated, their human will broken.

On those occasions when humans manage a victory, it almost never results in the death of the attacking corporation. When corporations lose a battle with feral humans, they can simply withdraw for a while, split into several persons, combine with another person, change their persona, or adopt other survival tricks which they have evolved over time. In fact, when entering new and presumably wild territory, a corporation would often clone itself and send its clone in. Even in the remote possibility that the clone dies from human attacks, the mother firm stays unharmed and as powerful as ever.

In prehistoric ages, our ancestors learned how to repel, disable or kill an attacking mammoth; the challenge of our age is learning how to do the same with corporations.









  • [Homestead] Corporations---Nost Malevolent Cancers of our time, Tvoivozhd, 11/13/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page