homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: RayZentz AT aol.com
- To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] that's a city !
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 20:18:37 -0400
Not sure of the actual formula, but they now include those who work from
home, and not for and employer in the traditional sesne. I feel this is
only correct, as there is more and more a trend in this direction, as many of
you are a part... or at least profess to be.
I don't se what the problem is. Figured the old way, I am currently
unemployed. However, I have an income, and while what I do is not the
"norm", I do not consider my self a drain on anyone, thus, not unemployed.
Personally, I think the numbers that should be used to reflect national
"unemployment" should be based on relative household income, not based on
where you get a check.
Ray
-
[Homestead] that's a city !,
Toni Hawryluk, 10/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Homestead] that's a city !,
DSanner106, 10/08/2004
- Re: [Homestead] that's a city !, Lynda, 10/08/2004
- Re: [Homestead] that's a city !, Kathyann Natkie, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] that's a city !,
DSanner106, 10/08/2004
- Re: [Homestead] that's a city !, Lynda, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] that's a city !,
RayZentz, 10/08/2004
- Re: [Homestead] that's a city !, Toni Hawryluk, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] that's a city !,
Toni Hawryluk, 10/08/2004
- Re: [Homestead] that's a city !, clanSkeen, 10/09/2004
- Re: [Homestead] that's a city !, clhw, 10/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.