Homestead mailing list

[Tvoivozhd <tvoivozd AT infionline.net>]

Toni Hawryluk wrote:

> From: Tvoivozhd<mailto:tvoivozd AT infionline.net> 
>
>  
>
> >    According to Richard Williams, a physicist and consultant to the David Sarnoff laboratory in 
> > Princeton HAARP constitutes "an irresponsible act of global vandalism." He and others fear a 
> > secret second stage where HAARP would "beam much more energy into the ionosphere. That could 
> > produce a severe disruption of the upper atmosphere at one location that may produce effects that 
> > spread rapidly around the Earth for years." (Quoted in Scott Gilbert, Environmental Warfare and US 
> > Foreign Policy: The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction,     
> > http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/GIL401A.html<http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/GIL401A.html>
> >  )
> >    
>
> Well, well, the cretin in the Wh___ House may soon be
> able to put Jupiter's 'red eye' "eternal hurricane" right here 
> on Earth ... will it be before the plans for it are leaked to
> 'terrorists' ?? Or have they already been .... while we're
> dying in Iraq to 'make the world safe for Democracy' -
> something Iraqis don't seem to want enough to "do it
> myself, Mommy !"
>
>  

tvoivozhd---knowledge knows no borders.  You can keep a government 
secret from trusting or ignorant voters, but not foreign  scientists who 
were educated in the same disciplines as U.S. scientists. After Einstein 
published the MC-squared bit, every physicist understood the 
significance as being the basis for an atomic explosion.  It wasn't a 
high priority with a Hitler concerned with the more immediate importance 
of jet engines, high-performance fighter aircraft and buzz-bombs, so 
heavy-water and nuclear fission search sucked the hind teat.

I have for some time been worried about the apparent head start the 
Chinese have in nanotech which can defeat many of the weapons we regard 
as safe, reliable and essential to our offense and defence.  I hope the 
U.S. is doing more than just tracking what the Chinese are doing, but I 
have little faith in the people who are, at the cost of one hundred 
billion dollars and pseudo-testing, still trying to hit  an 
intercontinental  bullet (missile) with our bullet---too damned 
complex---thousands of components subject to likely failure, and in any 
event, no defense against a flock of incoming---under the best of 
circumstances five percent would hit their target---one percent of 
incoming would end everything right there.