gmark AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Kata Markon
List archive
- From: "Jack Kilmon" <jkilmon AT historian.net>
- To: "Kata Markon" <gmark AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Judas and Jesus
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:00:59 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: <HStaiti AT aol.com>
To: "Kata Markon" <gmark AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 3:41 AM
Subject: [gmark] Re: Judas and Jesus
> In a message dated 2/22/01 4:51:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
JFAlward AT aol.com
> writes:
>
> > Joe
>
> Joe
> Instead of attempting to place the betrayal in Gethsemane in a historical
> context, and thereby interpret the passage, I suggest a consideration of
the
> narrative structure itself as the primary means of interpreting Mark
14.43-50.
> i.e., There are three plans at work here
> 1. Judas and the armed crowd have a plan
> 2. The disciples have no plan
> 3. Jesus recognizes God's plan from scripture
or...4. Judas is a fictional creation representing early Christian
anti-Jewish sentiment
to appease Roman sensibilities.
Jack
-----
______________________________________________
taybutheh d'maran yeshua masheecha am kulkon
Jack Kilmon
North Hollywood, Ca.
jkilmon AT historian.net
http://www.historian.net
sharing a meal for free.
http://www.thehungersite.com/
-
Judas and Jesus,
JFAlward, 02/22/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Judas and Jesus, HStaiti, 02/23/2001
- Re: Judas and Jesus, Ted Weeden, 02/23/2001
- Re: Judas and Jesus, Jack Kilmon, 02/23/2001
- Re: Judas and Jesus, JFAlward, 02/26/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.