Kata Markon

[Doug Jantz <dwjantz AT swbell.net>]

OK.  I still see Jesus answering the questions given to him by the apostles.
WHY would he all of a sudden switch to the end of time?  I do not see the
apostles getting the idea he switched.  Compare Luke's account of the same
scenario.  In Luke the events are all mixed up through the chapter, not split 
as
Mark/Matthew have done.

Doug

HStaiti AT aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 1/4/01 7:53:45 AM SA Pacific Standard Time,
> dwjantz AT swbell.net writes:
>
> > Why do you think it cannot speak of anything but the end of time?  Jesus
> >  was asked a question about the temple and then answered it.  Would the
> >  apostles have known he was speaking of the end of time when that was not
> >  what they asked?
>
> Why would it be anything but?
>
> The stated time progression in the text makes it clear that verses 24-27
> occur in the period after the events of 5--23
> The time of the distress (13.3-27)
> 1)  Events preceding "the end" (13.3-13)
> 2)  Events of the "days of distress" (13.14-23)
> 3)  Events of "Those days following that distress" (13.24-27)
>
> Peace to you,
> Harry Staiti
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Evangel Assembly of God
> "A Life-Giving Church"
> www.EvangelAssemblyOfGod.org (UPDATED Jan 2, 2001)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to gmark as: dwjantz AT swbell.net
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')



1304 E. Republic Rd. #180
Springfield, Missouri 65804

dwjantz AT swbell.net
<http://home.swbell.net/dwjantz>