freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63

From: ic005a3736 AT blueyonder.co.uk
To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:54:04 +0100 (BST)

> Hi Iain,
>
> Your diagnosis is correct.
> This functionality did regress somewhere between 0.62 and 0.63,
> as a result of improvements to the "query with ? placeholders" logic for
> both ODBC and ct-library (ct_dynamic)
>
> I have fixed and improved this now.
> A patch will be on its way to freetds this week.
>
> Bill

That's great thanks Bill.

[freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, Iain Calder, 07/24/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, Thompson, Bill D (London), 07/25/2005
  - Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ic005a3736, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/26/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, Thompson, Bill D (London), 07/26/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/28/2005