freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63
- From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
- To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:30:16 +0200
>
> Thanks Freddy,
>
> > tds_build_param_def_from_query and
> tds_build_param_def_from_params are
> > too similar, is better to reuse code.
>
> You're possibly right. Common, reusable code is obviously a
> good thing,
> but sometimes it can make the resulting code more difficult to
> understand/maintain.
>
> > tds_submit_query_params was used only by ctlib so there is
> no reason
> > for a tds_submit_query_params_ct
>
> I didn't realise that. good spot.
>
Fixed, deleted tds_submit_query_params, renamed
tds_submit_query_params_ct to tds_submit_query_params
> > also IMO tds_submit_query_params_ct should
> > support named and no named parameters (even using TDS7)
>
> I didn't fancy writing a SQL parser, which AFAICT is the only way
> to achieve this.
>
Yes, a parser is required. I discovered that is required even to support
'?' style parameter under Sybase... Even mssl support @param style on
server so I think that is better to rewrite code in another way, I would
suggest
- are there '?' style parameters? Substitute '?' with @Px (where x is 1,
2, 3, ...) and use these names for parameters. Do not use names passed
(do give error if names used ?? do use these names instead of @Px ??)
- if some parameters are unnamed parse query and try to detect missing
names. Is an error to use a mix of named and unnamed parameters??
- use query literally and parameters too
query sustitution should be done in client charset. Only on prepare use
default parameter type (varchar(80)). Also tds_submit_execdirect do not
support parameters for tds5, perhaps is better to use language
parameters instead of emulated execute (see coverage of
tds_submit_execdirect at
http://freetds.sourceforge.net/coverage/tds/query.c.gcov.html)...
bye
freddy77
-
[freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63,
Iain Calder, 07/24/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63,
Thompson, Bill D (London), 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ic005a3736, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/26/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, Thompson, Bill D (London), 07/26/2005
- Re: [freetds] ct_param differences between 0.62 and 0.63, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/28/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.