Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - RE: [freetds] ODBC - binary, row count and compatibility

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Thompson, Bill D (London)" <bill_d_thompson AT ml.com>
  • To: "'FreeTDS Development Group'" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [freetds] ODBC - binary, row count and compatibility
  • Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:21:09 -0000

Ahah!

as my children would say.... JINX!

Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James K. Lowden [SMTP:jklowden AT schemamania.org]
> Sent: 09 March 2004 15:17
> To: FreeTDS Development Group
> Subject: Re: [freetds] ODBC - binary, row count and compatibility
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT"
> <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com> wrote:
> > > 81(TDS7_RESULT)
> > > ff(DONEINPROC)
> > > 81(TDS7_RESULT)
> > > aa(ERROR)
> > > ff(DONEINPROC)
> > > 79(RETURNSTATUS)
> > > fe(DONEPROC)
> > >
> > > it can't return SUCCESS just because that last DONEPROC was
> > > OK. It has to
> > > notify the client there was an intervening ERROR.
> >
> > SQLExecDirect stop at first DONE, so it do not see the ERROR token and
> > returns SQL_SUCCESS.
>
> Does Microsoft's version stop at the first DONEINPROC?
>
> I don't understand how SQLExecDirect() can (correctly) stop before
> DONEPROC. How is the application expected to learn of the ERROR?
>
> --jkl
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds

==============================================================================

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify
the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose,
copy, retain or redistribute it.

Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
<http://www.ml.com/email_terms/>

==============================================================================





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page