freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] using default port 4000

From: Steve Langasek <vorlon AT netexpress.net>
To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] using default port 4000
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:09:50 -0600

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:36:29PM -0500, James K. Lowden wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:15:55 -0600, Steve Langasek <vorlon AT netexpress.net>
> wrote:

> > Perhaps it would be good to have 'CVS' as part of the version string
> > when we're not on a release branch?

> How about "dev", as in "0.62.dev"? I dislike naming things after their
> technologies, unless the technology is intrinsically important.

I would say '0.62-DEV', which gives me less of an impression of an exact
version string (something we probably don't want it to be seen as, since
many snapshots will bear the same string).

Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgprV5J5yI3F2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[freetds] using default port 4000, Jayaraman, Gautham, 02/14/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/14/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Jayaraman, Gautham, 02/14/2003
  - RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Frediano Ziglio, 02/14/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/14/2003
  - Re: [freetds] using default port 4000, Steve Langasek, 02/15/2003
    - Re: [freetds] using default port 4000, James K. Lowden, 02/18/2003
      - Re: [freetds] using default port 4000, Steve Langasek, 02/19/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, ZIGLIO Frediano, 02/19/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/20/2003
  - RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Frediano Ziglio, 02/21/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/21/2003