freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] using default port 4000

From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT schemamania.org>
To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] using default port 4000
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:36:29 -0500

On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:15:55 -0600, Steve Langasek <vorlon AT netexpress.net>
wrote:
>
> Perhaps it would be good to have 'CVS' as part of the version string
> when we're not on a release branch?

How about "dev", as in "0.62.dev"? I dislike naming things after their
technologies, unless the technology is intrinsically important.

--jkl

[freetds] using default port 4000, Jayaraman, Gautham, 02/14/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/14/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Jayaraman, Gautham, 02/14/2003
  - RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Frediano Ziglio, 02/14/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/14/2003
  - Re: [freetds] using default port 4000, Steve Langasek, 02/15/2003
    - Re: [freetds] using default port 4000, James K. Lowden, 02/18/2003
      - Re: [freetds] using default port 4000, Steve Langasek, 02/19/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, ZIGLIO Frediano, 02/19/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/20/2003
  - RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Frediano Ziglio, 02/21/2003
- RE: [freetds] using default port 4000, Lowden, James K, 02/21/2003