freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Castellano, Nicholas" <Nicholas_Castellano AT acml.com>
- To: "'freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org'" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:08:43 -0500
The following entry points were removed between BRANCH0_60 and HEAD of
libsybdb. By a strict interpretation of rule 6 in the libtool info
documentation, AGE should be set to 0, and we get a major version bump as a
result.
These should have been built conditionally in 0.60 but were built
unconditionally due to a bug:
asprintf
vasprintf
These were exposed portions of the API which should have been (and now are)
private:
_bcp_err_handler
get_server_info
get_size_by_type
send_conversion_error_msg
set_interfaces_file_loc
Since we pull in all of libtds, the following removed libtds entry points
were also removed from libsybdb:
tds7_send_login
tds_add_input_param
tds_alloc_config
tds_free_column
tds_free_config
tds_get_config
tds_get_ntstring
tds_is_control
tds_is_doneinproc
tds_is_end_of_results
tds_is_error
tds_is_fixed_token
tds_is_message
tds_is_result_row
tds_is_result_set
tds_msg_get_proc_name
tds_msleep
tds_process_column_row
tds_process_env_chg
tds_reset_msg_info
tds_send_login
tds_strtok_r
tds_write_packet
Cheers,
--nick
-----Original Message-----
From: freetds-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:freetds-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:04 AM
To: freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?
[Steve and I discussed the topic briefly on IRC a little while ago, and he
put the version back to 2.]
If anyone's aware of any reason that the sybdb version needs to be raised
for 0.61, now would be a fine time to speak up. Don't be shy.
--jkl
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or
instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying
out such orders and/or instructions.
-
[freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
Steve Langasek, 02/04/2003
-
Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
James K. Lowden, 02/04/2003
- Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?, Steve Langasek, 02/04/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
Lowden, James K, 02/04/2003
-
Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
Steve Langasek, 02/04/2003
- Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?, James K. Lowden, 02/05/2003
- Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?, Frediano Ziglio, 02/05/2003
-
Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
Frediano Ziglio, 02/05/2003
- Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?, Steve Langasek, 02/05/2003
-
Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
Steve Langasek, 02/04/2003
-
RE: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
Castellano, Nicholas, 02/05/2003
- Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?, Steve Langasek, 02/05/2003
- RE: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?, Lowden, James K, 02/07/2003
-
Re: [freetds] so version bump for dblib?,
James K. Lowden, 02/04/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.