freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon AT netexpress.net>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: freetds and SQL server 2000
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:26:38 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Bob Kline wrote:
> > The problem is that the 16-bit Unicode character space isn't large enough
> > to
> > cover all of the oriental character sets.
> Really? Are you sure? I know there are some really obscure corners
> that will have to go out beyond UFFFF (mostly archaic languages,
> perhaps), but I thought CJK all fit. What falls on the floor,
> specifically?
<grins> Well, everything written by the Chinese in the 19th century and
earlier, so I wouldn't say it's strictly a concern for 'archaic' languages. :)
(Certain aspects of modern Japanese also run afoul of the 16-bit limit, so
the problem isn't even restricted to 'legacy' content.)
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
-
RE: freetds and SQL server 2000
, (continued)
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Niky Riga, 06/07/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Brian Bruns, 06/07/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Bob Kline, 06/07/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Brian Bruns, 06/07/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Steve Langasek, 06/07/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, James K. Lowden, 06/07/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, James K. Lowden, 06/07/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Steve Langasek, 06/08/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Bob Kline, 06/08/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Niky Riga, 06/08/2001
- RE: freetds and SQL server 2000, Steve Langasek, 06/08/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.