FreeTDS Development Group

[Brian Bruns <camber AT umcc.ais.org>]

Hrmmm....My results:

test 4
------
Read a row of data -> 23 row 0023
Read a row of data -> 24 row 0024
Read a row of data -> 25 row 0025
second select
select * from dblib0004 where i>950 order by i
About to exec for the second time.  Should fail
DB-LIBRARY error (severity 7):
   Attempt to initiate a new SQL Server operation with results pending.
dblib okay on t0004.c

test 5
------
Read a row of data -> 47 row 0047
Read a row of data -> 48 row 0048
Read a row of data -> 49 row 0049
select * from dblib0005 where i>950 order by i
DB-LIBRARY error (severity 7):
   Attempt to initiate a new SQL Server operation with results pending.
dblib okay on t0005.c

These are under RedHat 5.2 (Linux 2.0.36), but that shouldn't really
matter.

I haven't looked at t0003 since you said it was broke, but I'll look into
that now. t0008 is really not working I agree.

Possibly something didn't get checked in? *shrug*

Brian

On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Craig Spannring wrote:

> Brian Bruns writes:
>  >
>  > Test 4 -> 7 now work (or at least report that they do). 8 fails, is it in
>  > working condition? I didn't look too hard (It's getting late here), but I
>  > wasn't sure if it's supposed to be working.
> 
> I just checked out and ran the test for dblib.  It still isn't quite
> checking out.  t0003, t0004, t0005, and t0008 produce different
> results with FreeTDS than with MS DB-Library.
> 
> 
> Here's the summary lines printed by t0004 through t0007:
> 
> Test   |   MS-DB Library on WinNT |  FreeTDS on FreeBSD
> -------+--------------------------+------------------------
> t0004  |   dblib okay on t0004.c  |  dblib failed! on t0004.c
> t0005  |   dblib okay on t0005.c  |  dblib failed! on t0005.c
> t0006  |   dblib okay on t0006.c  |  dblib okay on t0006.c
> t0007  |   dblib okay on t0007.c  |  dblib okay on t0007.c
> t0008  |   dblib okay on t0008.c  |  dblib failed! on t0008.c
> 
> 
> I haven't modified t0001 through t0003 to print a nice little summary
> line.  (I'd like to fix that this week, but I'm a little busy, so I
> probably won't add the nice little summary until next week.)
> 
> t0001.c, t0002.c produce the same results under both MS DB-Library and
> FreeTDS.
> 
> t0003 produces different result with FreeTDS than with MS DB-Library.
> The test is flawed and doesn't really test what I had planned on
> testing, but it still indicates a problem in dblib.
> 
> 
>  > 
>  > I'm thinking of maybe thursday or friday for the release. 
>  >
> 
> Personally I'd like to hold off until all of the the dblib unit tests
> are working.  That might also give someone enough time to work out the
> Solaris autoconf problem.
> 
> 
> -- 
> =======================================================================
>  Life is short.                  | Craig Spannring 
>       Ski hard, Bike fast.       | cts AT internetcds.com
>  --------------------------------+------------------------------------
>  Any sufficiently perverted technology is indistinguishable from Perl.
> =======================================================================
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as: camber AT ais.org
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to $subst('Email.Unsub')
> 
>