corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Tim Gallant" <tim AT rabbisaul.com>
- To: "Corpus-Paul" <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:41:06 -0700
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark D. Nanos" <mark AT marknanos.com>
To: "Corpus Paul" <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident
I started to question what was conveyed in Paul's ethnikws language whennoticing that zhs is in the present tense, but that when Paul is addressing
Peter, he is presently eating with Jews only, so it did not make sense as
commonly understood, and by you, for me. He should have written, "you were
living gentiley" before returning to "living Jewishly" if that was to be
clearly communicated, not you "are living gentiley."
I don't see that. Seems to me you are unduly restricting the implication of the tense. Greek present tense can convey a customary sense, no?
tim
---------------------------------
Tim Gallant
Pastor, Conrad Christian Reformed Church
http://www.timgallant.org
http://www.rabbisaul.com
-
[Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Jeff Krantz @ optonline.net, 03/27/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Mark D. Nanos, 03/27/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Tim Gallant, 03/27/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Jeff Krantz @ optonline.net, 03/28/2006
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10, Tim Gallant, 03/28/2006
-
[Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Loren Rosson, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Ian Scott, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Mark D. Nanos, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Ian Scott, 03/28/2006
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident, Mark D. Nanos, 03/28/2006
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident, Tim Gallant, 03/28/2006
- [Corpus-Paul] Priesthood of Melchizedek, Bob MacDonald, 03/29/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Ian Scott, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Mark D. Nanos, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Ian Scott, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 03/29/2006
-
[Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Ian Scott, 03/30/2006
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident, Harold Holmyard, 03/30/2006
-
[Corpus-Paul] The Antioch Incident,
Ian Scott, 03/30/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Jeff Krantz @ optonline.net, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Tim Gallant, 03/27/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Mark D. Nanos, 03/27/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Jeff Krantz @ optonline.net, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Mark D. Nanos, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Jeff Krantz @ optonline.net, 03/28/2006
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10, Mark D. Nanos, 03/28/2006
-
[Corpus-Paul] Hebrews,
Bob MacDonald, 03/28/2006
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Hebrews, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Jeff Krantz @ optonline.net, 03/28/2006
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] Galatians 3:10,
Mark D. Nanos, 03/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.