Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - RE: Jerusalem conference

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Doug Ward" <DWard AT globespec.com>
  • To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: RE: Jerusalem conference
  • Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:24:49 -0500




Near the
very end of the letter he reinforced the point yet again by implying in 6:12
that James and the disciples were the actual guilty persons behind the
Crucifixion of Christ. This dark and hazy smear was broadened in 1
Thessalonians 2:15-16, to a smear against "the Jews," meaning against the
supporters of the covenant. This passage was the climax to one of Paul's
autobiographical passages, 2:2-16, and it, too, cannot be properly
understood unless one understands truthfully what Galatians was all about,
which is circumcision.

I contend that one cannot truthfully understand Paul, and the creation of
Christianity by him and his followers who wrote the New Testament, unless
one understands how frightful and dangerous a thing circumcision was
perceived to be by the adult Gentile males who became Paul's followers and
the first "Christians."

Eric Zuesse
cettel AT shoreham.net


Eric,

I think I can understand how frightful a thing circumcision was to the
Gentile men of that era, or any other era. But let me ask you a question.
If Galatians 2 is the Jerusalem conference, then Galatians was written at
least a few months after this conference. And if Paul broadens his negative
feelings about the Jerusalem party in Galatians to a larger smear against
"the Jews in I Thess. then how do you date these documents? This seems to
be a sudden, broadening of negativity in only a few months time, or do you
date I Thess. later than the current majority opinion of 50 0r 51 C.E.?

Best Regards,

DOug Ward
Wheaton, IL




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page