corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Sheila E. McGinn, Ph.D." <smcginn AT jcu.edu>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: dating for Romans, etc.
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 08:32:09 -0400
David, I fail to see how either your scenario fro Paul's activity from 51-57
or your dating
for Romans c. 56-58 poses any problem with Romans being the last of his
seven-letter
corpus. Many scholars would agree with your scenario, and would date Phil &
Phlm 54-56. So
what is really at stake here? SEMcGinn
-
Re: dating for Romans, etc.,
Sheila E. McGinn, Ph.D., 05/17/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: dating for Romans, etc., David Inglis, 05/17/2002
- Re: dating for Romans, etc., zeba . crook, 05/18/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.