corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Sakari H�kkinen" <sakari.hakkinen AT sci.fi>
- To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Paul Not a Pharisee?
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:16:47 +0200
Robert,
> The evidence in 25.1.1999, certainly challenges the common
view, which until
> now I'd accepted without question, that Paul was a
Pharisee. However, it is
> equivocal, as Rene Salm observed, and thus hasn't
persuaded me to forsake
> the common view.
You don't have to. Paul could have been a Pharisee - in that
case he was a special kind of a Pharisee. The evidence does
not, however, prove that he was one. The problem is that we
have quite a little data about Pharisaism in the first
century.
> However, he was a Jew who believed that the Messiah had
come, had risen from
> the dead after being rejected and crucified, was the Son
of God, and was the
> source of salvation. Thus, Jesus Christ, rather than
Paul's Jewish heritage
> and the Law, became the center of his life and the thing
that drove him.
That is true.
all the best,
Sakari
Sakari Hakkinen, PhD
University of Helsinki
Department of Biblical Studies
sakari.hakkinen AT evl.fi
http://www.helsinki.fi/teol/hyel/henkilo/henkilo.html
-
Vs: Paul Not a Pharisee?,
Sakari Häkkinen, 01/18/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: Vs: Paul Not a Pharisee?,
Robert Hunter, 01/19/2000
- Paul Not a Pharisee?, Sakari Häkkinen, 01/19/2000
- Re: Vs: Paul Not a Pharisee?, Mark D. Nanos, 01/19/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.