Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: C-P: Who wrote Hebrews?

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Mike Myers <mmyers AT helium.biomol.uci.edu>
  • To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: C-P: Who wrote Hebrews?
  • Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 18:51:03 -0800


It's way too smooth and above all CLEAR to have been written by
Paul, I think. Has none of the choppy breaks in thought, conceptual
lacunae we all know and love in P. If only this writer had been
around as his editor/ghostwriter from this beginning, it would have
saved the world lots of grief!


Mike

------------------------
From: Jon Peter <jnp AT home.com>
Subject: Re: C-P: Who wrote Hebrews?
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 18:50:13 -0700
To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>


The Catholic Encyclopedia article makes me lean toward Paul as the
source of
ideas and a ghost writer as the literary stylist.

http://www.knight.org/advent/cathen/07181a.htmIt

Hebrs. was written in Rome. Paul was ensconced there for 2 years
receiving
admiring visitors, so he had the unhurried opportunity to write. The
letter
indicates an imprisonment. It mentions Tim. It shows extensive
development
of several familiar Pauline ideas. Hence, the author either knew the
thinking, or was Paul himself.

Moreover the author enjoyed stature with the Jerusalem church.
Considering
Paul's prolific output when traveling and pastoring, it seems
natural that
he would continue this literary inclination and would write to a
place where
he had connections and diplomacy to do.

In short, Paul had means, motive, and opportunity. I don't see any
other
candidate who quite fits the bill.

His ghost-writer could have been selected from the presumably
significant
Roman Church literati on the merits of his/her obvious superior
skill -- a
higher caliber resource person than Paul had available earlier .

The ideas, themes and theology in Hebrews were of Jewish interest
obviously,
which was not the case in Paul's other letters, and so this radical
difference perhaps allowed Paul greater freedom to philosophize, and
this
too may account for the un-Paul-like results.

Even so, when you strip away the elegance, you see that the kernel ideas
you'd expect to from Paul. He is addressing, more majestically than he has
previously had luxury to do, the Jerusalem Jews, rather than writing polemic
to fix troublesome flocks in Greece.

One would also expect Paul to be politic in so writing to Jerusalem, after
the reputation he must have made from his writing to Gentiles.

Last but not least, no less than Clement of Rome (a contemporary in time and
place!) and Origen also subscribe to a Pauline inspiration scenario, more or
less.

Regards,

Jon



---
You are currently subscribed to corpus-paul as: mmyers AT helium.biomol.uci.edu
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')


---------------End of Original Message-----------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael D. A. Myers
University of California, Irvine
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<mmyers AT helium.biomol.uci.edu>
06/03/1999
18:51:03





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page