Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: beginner's guide to the 'new perspective'?

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeffrey B. Gibson" <jgibson000 AT mailhost.chi.ameritech.net>
  • To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: beginner's guide to the 'new perspective'?
  • Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 08:51:48 -0500


Mark Goodacre wrote:

> On 19 May 99 at 10:01, Jonathan Ryder wrote:
>
> > What I'm really looking for are answers to questions like: what was old
> > perspective? What are essential points of new perspective? What are main
> > arguments for and against? Are there any subtle (or not so subtle)
> > variations on either old or new of which I need to be aware?
>
> A good introduction is the following:
>
> James D. G. Dunn, ‘The New Perspective on Paul: Paul and the Law’, in Karl
> P.
> Donfried (ed.), The Romans Debate (Rev. and expanded edition, Edinburgh: T
> & T
> Clark, 1991), pp. 299-308
>
> I seem to recall seeing the same or similar in Dunn's Romans commentary
> (Word
> Series) but don't have a copy of that on my shelf.
>

You ar correct in your recollection. There is a subsection in the
introduction in Vol.
1 of Dunn's Romans Commentary (pp. lxiii-lxxii) entitled "The New Perspective
on Paul"
Paul and the Law" which also contains a full page of bibliography.

Yours,

Jeffrey Gibson
--
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626
e-mail jgibson000 AT ameritech.net






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page