corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Jerry Sumney <jsumney AT lextheo.edu>
- To: 'Corpus-paul' <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: II Corinthians
- Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 21:30:11 -0400
David Amador wrote:
The broader question of 'so what?', with respect to rhetoric, however, is
that a text like 2 Corinthians continues to have an important persuasive
impact upon us. This is something historical criticism can never address,
by dint of its limited purview - to limit the meaning of the text to a
singular moment in time 1900 years ago upon a community half way around the
world.
I respond:
I do not see this as a criticism of the historical method. This is simply
recognizing what it was designed to do. I would hope that this is the
first task of rhetorical criticism as well. To move to "its impact on us"
launches one into a broader arena within the topic of hermeneutics. That
is an interesting topic, but one which should not be completely identified
with the task of understanding an ancient author.
Jerry
Jerry L. Sumney
Lexington Theological Seminary
631 S. Limestone
Lexington, KY 40508
jsumney AT lextheo.edu
(606) 252-0361
-
Re: II Corinthians
, (continued)
- Re: II Corinthians, Carlton Winbery, 05/17/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, Mike Thompson, 05/18/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, David Amador, 05/18/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, George Blaisdell, 05/18/1999
- RE: II Corinthians, Jerry Sumney, 05/18/1999
- RE: II Corinthians, Jerry Sumney, 05/18/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, Jim Hester, 05/18/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, David Amador, 05/18/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, Mark Matson, 05/18/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, David Amador, 05/18/1999
- RE: II Corinthians, Jerry Sumney, 05/19/1999
- Re: II Corinthians, David Amador, 05/19/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.