Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: (To Nanos) DIKAIOSUNH and Jews-Gentile Relations

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "kosala@md2" <kosala AT md2.vsnl.net.in>
  • To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: (To Nanos) DIKAIOSUNH and Jews-Gentile Relations
  • Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 22:25:20 +0530


Dear Mr. Mark and dear Mr. Moon,

The discussion you both had on Dikaiosunh was interesting. What I found was
that it was like a play between two who like to play.

In my opinion, it is clear that Paul is referring to the contrast-situation
found with the Jews. Paul is not ambigous here or anywhere in this epistle
about the reason which he mentions here, as to what is THE requirement for
the salvation.

Kishore
Professor, Pastor and Social-activist

-----Original Message-----
From: moon-ryul jung <moon AT saint.soongsil.ac.kr>
To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 2:33 PM
Subject: RE: (To Nanos) DIKAIOSUNH and Jews-Gentile Relations


>Dear Mark, it would be exciting to experience yet another shift of
>paradigm! But to be successful, the shift of paradigm needs
>stubborn opponents. Let me play that role for the sake of arguments,
>at the least.
>
>[Moon]
>>What about Rom 9:32: Why? Because they did not persue it by faith,
>>but as if it were by works (hOTI OUK EK PISTEWS ALL WS EX ERGWN)?
>
>[Mark]
>What is your question? It seems to me that Paul is explaining the response
>to gentile inclusion, will it be by works (i.e., proselyte conversion, not
>the doing of Law by Jewish people) or by miraculous inclusion by faith
>of/in Christ?
>
>[Moon]
>I do not understand your comments. Rom 9:32 provides to the fact
>that ISRAHL DE DIWKWN NOMON DIKAIOSUNHS EIS NOMON OUK EFQASEN
>(Israel who was seeking the law of righteousnes did not attain the law).
>
>Paul said that they failed to attain the law of righteousness,
>BECAUSE they did not seek it OUK EK PISTEWS ALL' WS EX ERGWN
>(not by faith, but as if by works). Here the issue is NOT about
>Gentile inclusion, whether by faith of/in Christ or
>by proselyte conversion, BUT about why the Jews themselves failed
>to attain the law of righteousness.
>
>I also think that ERGWN refers to identity marks of Jews, not doing of the
>law. But the context seems to indicate that the adherence to the
>identity marks caused Jews to seek the law OUK EK PISTEWS.
>So, why do you think that the section including 9:32 has to do with
>Jewish response to Gentile inclusion, not with their own fate?
>
>Respectfully
>
>Moon-Ryul Jung
>Assistant Professor
>Dept of Computer Science
>Soongsil University
>Seoul, Korea
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to corpus-paul as: kosala AT md2.vsnl.net.in
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
>
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page